Ch. 1: Diamonds of India

Ch. 1: Diamonds of India Page of 143 Ch. 1: Diamonds of India Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
22
DIAMONDS.
King, to have been wrong in identifying this deposit, which rests on gneiss, with the true old diamond con­glomerate of Banaganpilly, of which it should, there­fore, not be regarded as an outlier—though, doubtless, there is some similarity in the component pebbles, &c, which form both rocks.
Dr. Benza believed the conglomerate to be con­tinuous from hence through Ellore and Rajahmundry to Samulcotah, where also diamonds are said to have been found.
PURTIAL OR PURTEEALI.
The mines so called are situated near a village of the same name, which is not far from
Kondapilly, about 150 miles from Haidrabad, on the road to Masulipatam. The property of them was reserved by the late Nizam when he ceded the northern circars to the English Government. They are superficial, not extending ten or twelve feet deep in any part. For some years past the working of them has been discontinued.
Mr. Briggs, the author of the above, who is quoted by Captain Burton,* adds :—
And there is no tradition of their ever having produced very valuable stones.
Captain Burton remarks upon the statement that it is full of error, as the Pitt or Regent diamond came from Purtial, but Captain Newbold says it came from Borneo, being bought by Mr. Pitt, from a merchant of Bencoolen, in Sumatra.
Regarding the origin of these diamonds from the various localities bordering the Kistna river, near Kondapilly, Captain Newbold expresses his belief that the materials of the beds were brought down
• " Quarterly Journal of Science," N.S., vol. vi. 1876.
Ch. 1: Diamonds of India Page of 143 Ch. 1: Diamonds of India
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
Ball. Diamonds Coal and Gold of India.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
bullet Tag
This Page