Quantcast

Ch. 13: Principal Diamond Mines of S. Africa

Ch. 13: Principal Diamond Mines of S. Africa Page of 448 Ch. 13: Principal Diamond Mines of S. Africa Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
PRINCIPAL SOUTH AFRICAN MINES 289
underground working in 1902, when there was a profit of 3d. per load, to 1905, which showed a profit of 8s. 4d. per load.
Open working was carried to a greater depth in this mine than in either of the other Kimberley mines. Four hundred feet was the usual limit, but the Bultfontein was dug to 460 feet.
The De Beers.
The De Beers diamond mine is about one mile east from the Kimberley and in the central part of the city of Kimberley. In extent it is 958 feet east and west by 630 feet north and south and the original locations cov­ered a surface equal to 622 claims or 13.72 acres. It was in this mine that Cecil Rhodes centered his inter­ests, and from the nucleus he created there, forced the Kimberley interests to join the combination which finally embraced all the producing mines of South Africa at that time. The De Beers did not in the beginning, nor does it now, yield as many diamonds as the Kimberley, but the average quality is better, though not as good as those from the west end of the Kimberley, and the per­centage of crystals which can be cut to jewels is larger. What the comparative output of the two mines of late years is, cannot be stated, as the returns are given to­gether in the yearly statements of the company. In 1907 the combined output was less than that of the Wesselton or the Bultfontein, and the yield per load was but little better than either of the latter, the De Beers and Kimberley being .37 of a carat, the Wes­selton .32 and the Bultfontein .33.
This mine is more liable to mud-rushes than the 19
Ch. 13: Principal Diamond Mines of S. Africa Page of 448 Ch. 13: Principal Diamond Mines of S. Africa
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
bullet Tag
This Page