This chapter is tagged (labeled) with: 

Ch. 3: Part I: New Syndicate

Ch. 3: Part I: New Syndicate Page of 688 Ch. 3: Part I: New Syndicate Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
indemnification of the Syndicate by the producers in case of prejudicial action by the Government of the Union and of South West Africa which might affect the Syndicate.
Time was running short and a position of great delicacy was develop­ing. The situation was complicated by the increasing apprehensions felt by the older producers, especially De Beers, at the growth of 'outside' production, in the Union as well as in the outside world, which meant that to be given the same quota in an inter-producers' agreement did not imply being given the same percentage of total world sales as De Beers had formerly enjoyed. De Beers, therefore, desired a larger quota, if possible, and insisted that in no case would the company submit to a lower percentage quota. The other big Union producers—Jagersfontein and the Premier (Transvaal) mines—were also opposed to any lowering of their quotas. The Consolidated Diamond Mines were dissatisfied with their own quota and wanted an increased percentage: besides this, they were desirous, if possible, of shaking off the hand of the Administrator in the conduct of nego­tiations. The 'outside' producers in South West Africa also wanted an increased percentage. The Administrator, naturally, wanted to con­serve his legal rights, maintain his revenue from diamonds, on which he so largely depended, and to preserve the position of South West Africa as a producer against the Union producers. The Syndicate, besides its usual preoccupation with the volume of purchases (in terms of money), the volume of replacements, and prices, was also anxious to safeguard itself against the effects of possible adverse taxation, even going so far as to suggest being given the right of cancellation of the contract in certain contingencies.
The producers met at Pretoria at a conference on 3 November 1924, the Minister of Mines being in the chair. No agreement could be arrived at; Ross Frames, representing De Beers, actually going so far as to threaten to revert to open competition if he was to be called on to sacrifice anything more: 'we would rather give free vent, free exercise to what we consider our competitive capacity. We would rather die fighting if we are to go down.' That was not 'quite the spirit of compromise', as Sir David Graaff, representing the Con­solidated Diamond Mines, put it, but he was bluntly answered 'We do not want a compromise'.
Ross Frames showed himself less intransigent as time went on, but if there was a gradual approximation to agreement on the subject of the South West Africa quota, there still remained the problem of the
Ch. 3: Part I: New Syndicate Page of 688 Ch. 3: Part I: New Syndicate
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page