Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
FROM CRISIS TO CHAIRMANSHIP OF DE BEERS
161
friendly relations were now to aid him in the realization of one of his cherished ambitions—a seat on the De Beers board, and, if possible, the attainment of the chairmanship of the company.
He had intimated his desire to join the Dc Beers board as early as 1915. In September of that year, the De Beers board, having in vain attempted to get him to accept 'some gift from the company in recog­nition of his valuable services to them and the town during his mayor­alty and prior to that period' wanted to 'offer him a sum of £500 for the services he has rendered at various times to this company'. On 15 November 1915, the minutes of De Beers record that:
A letter was read from Mr. E. Oppenheimer, dated London, 22 October, saying that the company's offer of a monetary consideration gave him a great deal of satisfaction, and he appreciates it but does not sec his way to accept it. On the other hand, as the company evidently desires to show appreciation in some way, he brings forward a request that he be appointed, when the opportunity occurs, a director of the company. Resolved in reply to inform Mr. Oppenheimer that some time ago it was tacitly agreed not to fill up any vacancies in the directorate during the war, and further, that when the time arrives to do so the prior claims of others will have to be first considered.
As events unfolded themselves in 1926 and subsequent years, the question of who should occupy the chair of the De Beers company, though always important, became a matter of more far-reaching significance than could have been anticipated at the beginning of the year, when the two brothers started discussing the situation at Dc Beers. The chairman at the time was P. Ross Frames, who had been on the board of the Premier (Transvaal) Mine, and had been its manag­ing director for many years, and who had become chairman of the Dc Beers board as well as the Premier board in 1923. He owed his original appointment to the De Beers board largely to the influence of Solly Joel, but there was reason to suppose that Joel had become dissatisfied with the state of affairs at De Beers. As early as 1 January 1926, Louis was writing to Ernest Oppenheimer that 'I shall very shortly ask Solly to move in the question of the directorship and will let you know as soon as possible. As I told you before, the principle is definitely agreed and for an early date. Solly B. Joel wants to see the question of the chairmanship settled. . . .' But for the moment (what­ever private thoughts Ernest Oppenheimer may have nourished as to the future) the point at issue was membership of the Dc Beers board, not the attainment of the chairmanship. At the end of January, Louis was writing, '. . . I had a further talk re De Beers and all S. B. J. asked
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page