Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
164                              SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
Uitgevonden—had greatly increased. In February 1926 alluvial output in the Lichtenburg district was only 567 carats—from April to Septem­ber the monthly output rose from 2,888 carats to 96,000 carats. It attained 229,000 carats in April 1927 and, though a fall occurred there­after, it again attained 223,000 carats in September of that year. While average output from the alluvial fields for the ten years ended 31 December 1926 was some £1,854,000 per annum, the value of the output for the single twelve months ended 30 September 1926 was £6,258,000.
In the light of these occurrences it is not difficult to understand that both within and without diamond circles there should have been serious apprehensions as to the future of the diamond industry. It is true that there had been similar periods of new discoveries in the past, and, as Ernest Oppcnheimer was to point out to the shareholders of Anglo American Corporation in 1929—at a time, it is true, when the legal position was different from what it had been in 1926 and when alluvial production in Lichtenburg was declining and the worst of the panic was over—taking a long view, the situation was far from being catastrophic. It was the case that production in Southern Africa as a whole in 1926, 1927 and 1928, the true crisis years, was far below the production of 1913 when it had attained 6,870,000 metric carats, while even if World production were taken as a basis of calculation, out­put in 1926 was below that of 1913 and the output of 1928 (1928 being the year of greatest output when it reached 7,754,000 metric carats) was not greater than the 1913 production by more than some three-quarters of a million carats. In the fifteen-year interval the world's purchasing power, of course, had greatly expanded, so that a secular increase in output was not necessarily an evil at all. Still the actual production figures do not tell the whole story—potential production had also to be taken into account. De facto production measured not only the absorptive capacity of the market—in effect this was at times seriously below actual production—but also the success of the efforts made through the traditional measures of limitation of output and
valued at £154,000, giving an average of over £12 per carat. The biggest stone, a silvery cape of hexoctahedral habit, weighed 85 carats, and was worth £60 per carat. The most valuable, a perfect blue-white distorted octahedron, weighing 71-5 carats, was sold for £8,000, which makes it the most valuable diamond so far found in any of our South African detrital deposits. The parcel also contained quite a number of smaller blue-white stones of the first water. Very slightly yellow stones or silvery capes, pale yellow stones, and faintly spotted diamonds (pique), however, predominate.' Further: 'Another very unusual feature, to which Mr. Arend Brink, the eminent expert, drew the writers' attention, is, to use his own words "the . . . wide range of coloured and yellow diamonds".'
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page