Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
FROM CRISIS TO CHAIRMANSHIP OF DE BEERS                 183
very clear-sighted. He had already proposed Sir David Harris as chairman of De Beers in January 1926. Reviewing the situation at the beginning of 1927, he wrote to Louis on 19 January:
... It is quite clear that a chairman, both for De Beers and the Premier must be appointed, and the matter will no doubt be discussed after Joel's arrival in London. To judge from certain remarks Joel has dropped since, I would not be surprised if he were so sick of the whole position (not having enough pluck to assert his and our position as shareholders), that he would suggest that Lord Bessborough should be made chairman of De Beers, Sir David Harris deputy chairman, and myself chairman of the Premier company. This would, of course, flatter Bessborough enormously; and I have no doubt would be acceptable to Rothschilds. I cannot imagine anything worse for the De Beers company than the above appointments. One can only have influence with the Government if De Beers is looked upon as a South African company, and that feeling would be entirely destroyed by making a man in London chairman. It is just at this juncture that De Beers require Government support, but it is certain that, whichever party is in power, they will most strongly resent the shifting of the chairmanship of De Beers to London.
Needless to say, as I would be distinctly in the running if a chairman for De Beers were to be appointed in South Africa, I have not expressed these views to Joel, because he would naturally think that I had some ulterior motive in objecting, but I wish you would discuss the matter with him when you meet, without mentioning my name. You know quite well I would support Sir David Harris as chairman of De Beers, because I feel convinced that we could work together. Naturally, if I could eventually be appointed I would be pleased and I am sure that I could do good work for the company. . . .
To be frank, he was not always in the future to be so friendly to the idea of serving under Sir David Harris and, on the personal side of the problem, he was to discover that he had aroused a disconcerting jealousy on the part of his own relative, F. Hirschhorn, which can in part be credited to the latter's long association with Breitmeyer and Company, one of the firms extruded from the Diamond Syndicate. Moreover, he was to encounter opposition from another quarter; important French shareholders did not at all like the idea of De Beers being 'run' by an important member of the Syndicate. On 6 May 1927 Louis cabled:
Grenfell [later the first Lord St. Just], Vivian Smith [later the first Lord Bicester] interviewed Bessborough [deputy chairman of De Beers] yesterday, who wanted to point out to them why it was difficult to make you chairman. Rothschilds, he and French interests, while personally most friendly and
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page