Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
184
SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
willing you should occupy position, felt dual position as chairman and practically head Diamond Syndicate incompatible. I explained that you were acting chairman Consolidated Diamond Mines, showing it was a possible proposition. Morgan, Grenfell and Company see our point of view . . . [and] thought your full plan would obviously be best for all concerned.
By this time, it is evident the discussion of the 'full plan' was encounter­ing very heavy weather. The proposal in itself was simple enough: De Beers was to take over all diamond interests and accept Ernest Oppenheimer as leader.
It must not be overlooked, in following the course of negotiations, that Ernest Oppenheimer was in a very strong position—stronger, in fact, than that of De Beers. He had the ear of the Opposition and was on no unfriendly terms with the Government; he controlled the Syndicate, he had acquired important interests in the H.M. Association shares, and he had interests in Angola and African Selection Trust, as well as friendly relations with the Congo companies and in British Guiana. He was associated with Solly Joel in Lichtenburg and at Alexander Bay and, if not a majority holder in De Beers itself, he and his associated companies held very large parcels of its shares. If the market weakened, he could acquire more De Beers shares if necessary, and so increase his hold. He had powerful friends in the City of London; his prestige was high and rising. Against all this, De Beers suffered from lack of leadership in South Africa, and the increased competition of alluvial directly affected it both as regards the output of the Premier Mine and the Kimberley mines. It took a very long time—it had not yet arrived—for the older hands at De Beers fully to grasp the strength of Ernest Oppenheimer's position; the case was fully deployed later on. But it is clear that even at the beginning of 1927, Ernest Oppen­heimer, though playing for high stakes, did so in the knowledge that he held an exceedingly good hand.
He had begun by explaining the Alexander Bay situation to the De Beers board in Kimberley, and it was already evident that he was in a fighting mood. On Saturday, 7 April, the secretary De Beers, Kimberley, wrote to the secretary of the London transfer office
a telephonic message was received from Sir Ernest Oppenheimer about 10 o'clock with reference to Port Nolloth diamonds, saying that he had bought the Merensky diamonds, that they were worth .£12 105. od. per carat, and that 300,000 carats of such diamonds had been proved. Sir Ernest stated that he had an option, which expired at 12 o'clock that day, to purchase
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page