Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
FROM CRISIS TO CHAIRMANSHIP OF DE BEERS                 193
decision to create a State diggings: the advent of Government-produced diamonds made it easier, if the Government thought fit, to pursue a preferential policy towards the new enterprise.
This was not the only aspect of the new venture to cause resentment.8 As early as 1924 De Beers had expressed the view that, if a diamond-cutting industry were to be set up, it should be a Government-owned enterprise, in order to avoid many difficulties. When the contract came up for discussion in the Assembly in the summer of 1928, it was referred to the Select Committee on Public Accounts. Sir David Harris, who on this occasion assumed the role of principal expert speaker in the Assembly (Ernest Oppenheimer being in Europe), also appeared before the select committee, and on 19 April 1928 made an important pronouncement there on behalf of the Diamond Syndicate:
I am not opposed to the industry being established, but I am opposed to De Beers starting it. We produce the rough diamonds and we sell them to the Syndicate and they pay cash. I have always held that the people who should start the cutting industry on a decent scale is the Syndicate because they are in a better position to do it. I have been trying to induce the Syndicate, being a South African, to start the industry and at last I have succeeded. They are prepared to start without a subsidy at all. On 30 March last I received a cable from them containing terms and proposals on which it is prepared to establish a cutting and polishing industry in South Africa.
This statement of Sir David Harris was a httle fanciful: as a matter of fact on 24 March 1928 the following cable had been sent to him signed by Solly Joel and Ernest Oppenheimer.
Understand diamond-cutting agreement referred to select committee. What is your opinion result? If necessary think we should do something ourselves without subsidy in order to destroy agreement which, if allowed as provided by clause II, would be serious danger whole trade. Advisable you should confer confidentially Smuts.
In the detailed offer which followed, it was specifically provided that 'Sir Ernest Oppenheimer would make all the necessary arrangements
8 For a slashing attack reference may be made to the speech delivered by Sir David Harris at the thirty-ninth annual general meeting of De Beers on 9 December 1927, Annual Report for 1927, pp. 31-2. As early as 1919, De Beers had decided, as Sir David Harris pointed out, quoting from his own speech in that year, to erect a cutting factory containing ioo mills, to 'be let to approved persons on very reasonable terms to encourĀ­age them to cut and polish diamonds. . . . Eight years have elapsed since that proposal was made, and during the whole of that period we did not receive one application for the hiring of mills.'
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page