Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
196                                     SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
diamonds of the Hans Merensky Association . . . allowing for export tax, amounts to between ^7,000,000 and ^8,000,000.'
From the standpoint of security (illicit diamond buying was rampant) a speedy working out of the Merensky claims was desirable, but this involved, of course, a corresponding financial burden in 'carrying' the stock so accumulated, for it could not be expected that tins great output of immensely valuable stones could be sold en bloc to the market without wrecking it, and so doing immeasurable damage to the older as well as the newer producers. In any case, the contract entered into by Ernest Oppenheimer with the Hans Merensky Association on 7 January 1928 (at a time, be it noted, when the Oppenheimer-Barnato group were not yet the dominant owners in the association), provided for the purchase of 'all the diamonds produced by the association from the claims owned or controlled by it', but took account of the various turns which Government policy might take. The basic intention of the agreement was to provide for purchases over a two-year period, with an undertaking that at the end of the two years, calculated from the date of the first delivery, Ernest Oppenheimer undertook to buy the stock of diamonds then on hand. If a sales quota were fixed, then the quota would be purchased: if that quota were less than f 600,000 for the first year, then he was obligated, subject to Government approval, to buy diamonds to the extent of the difference between -£600,000 and the sales quota. If the Government objected to the sale to Ernest Oppenheimer of the stock remaining at the end of the two-year period, he was willing to advance two-thirds of the value of such stock 'subject to the consent of the Government being obtained if such consent is necessary'.
In the early months of 1928 negotiations took place with Govern­ment, complicated by the fact that the ministerial attitude was changed in the course of discussion. Originally a sales quota of f 600,000 per annum was proposed, as suggested by the Minister himself; when this was refused, a figure of -£500,000 was put forward: this also led to no result. What finally emerged was the so-called 'memorandum of undertaking', signed on 7 March 1928. The undertaking imposed on the association an obligation to employ only European labour 'recruited as far as possible from the district of Namaqualand': obligated it to regulate operations 'as far as may be practicable so as to extend them over a period of five years calculated from the date of this undertaking' and gave the association no sales quota at all. On the contrary, all diamonds won were to be deposited by the association
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page