Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
I98                              SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
and the Government to have the right to 'put' 100,000 carats immedi­ately. This offer was coupled with the condition that Government would release for export 240,000 carats of Merensky diamonds at the rate of 10,000 carats a month, but 'if we are required by the Govern­ment to take immediate delivery of 100,000 carats, the Government shall simultaneously release to the association for export 100,000 carats of the latter's diamonds'. Government refused to couple the two sets of transactions.11 On 13 February 1929, however, as the result of stiff bargaining, Ernest Oppenheimer signed an agreement with the Govern­ment for the purchase of three parcels valued at approximately £562,000 each, or £1,750,000 in all: the first parcel to be composed of 45,720 carats inspected and valued by the Syndicate; one of the conditions being that 'the Government to be at liberty to set aside out of the said two subsequent parcels such diamonds for cutting purposes in the Union as in its discretion it may deem fit. . .'. Another condition was that the Syndicate, in spite of these very large commitments, undertook not to reduce prices to De Beers for any diamonds bought from it in the second half of 1929 and to guarantee to buy, during the same period, a minimum of £3 million from the producers as a whole.
No consistent policy in regard to the Alexander Bay diamonds ever eventuated, though 'Merensky diamonds' were released from time to time. At the time of the collapse of the international diamond market as a result of the international economic crisis in the early thirties, a substantial unsold balance remained.
The final technical problem which occupied Ernest Oppenheimer during this period was the question of how to supply diamond cutters in South Africa with the stones they required. There was no dis­position on his part to question the desirability of establishing such an industry: the establishment of the Kimberley Diamond Cutting Company proved the contrary. But there was a danger of the Euro­pean diamond industry being adversely affected by too generous a policy towards the South African cutters, and of consequential damage being done to the producers, whose contribution to South African economic life and to government revenues was very considerable.
Ernest Oppenheimer addressed two communications to the Minister
11 In the light of the situation discussed in the succeeding section, it is important to note that the terms of the offer of 17 November, 1928 though 'made in the name of the Diamond Syndicate', had been communicated to the 'big four' producers and 'negotiations with them are now proceeding which, if they are satisfactorily concluded will result in their taking a 50 per cent interest in this offer to the Government'.
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page