Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
FROM CRISIS TO CHAIRMANSHIP OF DE BEERS                 201
IX ♦
The spring months of 1928 were to be critical in more than one respect. The question of the chairmanship of De Beers was still undecided, yet the dynamic leadership of Ernest Oppenheimer and his growing degree of control over the new sources of diamond supply were changing the balance of power in the diamond world to the disadvantage of De Beers and were causing anxiety at Kimberley. But any move designed to put De Beers into a more advantageous position implied negotiations with Ernest Oppenheimer, which would inevit­ably and immediately raise the question of the chairmanship.
On 20 September 1928 Louis (then in South Africa) and Ernest Oppenheimer sent the following cable to Solly Joel:
Returned from Kimberley this morning where had long discussion with De Beers directors. . . . They do not like that Namaqualand diamonds are all in our hands and are anxious to come to some arrangement with you and us so that conference producers could join with us in purchasing H.M. Association, Cape Coast Exploration and Government diamonds. I am negotiating for purchase Government diamonds on your and our behalf. De Beers' idea is that we should form company to purchase these diamonds in which Syndicate and conference producers should have half each. . . . De Beers have just telephoned me that whole board coming Johannesburg see me tomorrow. I shall take up attitude, without committing you in any way, that producers cannot expect us to let them share merely in portion of our outside business but that I could only recommend any business to you if they participate in all our outside business whether good diamonds or inferior. Further that Syndicate must get reasonable commission on turnover of this company for handling business. . . . If company could be formed on lines we have in mind it seems to us to have following great advantages:
2.   It consolidates position for all time. We would of course take care to safeguard that Syndicate are managers of company.
3.   Huge sums will be required for outside business as it is certain that for long time there will be considerable output of Government diamonds. Perhaps we could also put Lichtenburg farms into new company. . . .
There was thus revived a suggestion which must have been perfectly familiar to Solly Joel, since in its original form, before Lichtenburg and Namaqualand had even been discovered, it had formed part of the proposed settlement in connexion with the transfer of the Barnato shares in the Premier (Transvaal) Mine to De Beers in 1917. There had
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page