Quantcast

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers

Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
202
SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
been an acrimonious exchange of views between the diamond comĀ­mittees in London and Kimberley on the subject in 1919: London then taking up the standpoint that 'we shall have nothing to do with buying and selling company'. Moreover, in the course of 1925, there had been further correspondence between the diamond committee in Kimberley and London relating to a scheme of a selling company to be registered in England which would have given 60 per cent of the capital to the producers and 40 per cent to the Syndicate, with the producers also having a majority on the board. The scheme had evidently been inspired by Ross Frames and had been discussed with Solly Joel and F. Hirschhorn in February 1925, as well as with Lord Bessborough.
Ernest Oppenheimer's cable of 20 September was followed by a cable from De Beers, Kimberley, to Dc Beers, London, substantially in the same terms.12 In the light of subsequent discussions, the important point was that in addition to F. Hirschhorn and odier old directors of De Beers, it was signed by A. Viallate, the representative of the Paris Rothschilds and of French shareholders generally on the board of De Beers. Although also signed by Ernest Oppenheimer, the cable ended by pointing out that 'although Sir E. Oppenheimer had particiĀ­pated in all discussions referred to in this cable and has agreed to sign it, he made it perfectly clear that he could not commit Syndicate'.
Yet within a fortnight Ernest Oppenheimer was threatening to resign from the board of De Beers! On 4 October 1928 in a cable to Louis announcing the release of 100,000 carats of Merensky diamonds and the purchase of 100,000 carats of Government diamonds, he added:
'Scheme reference selling company prepared by Viallate absolutely impossible. Generally speaking attitude (except certain named persons) so offensive that I shall probably resign De Beers board asking them appoint you.'
Whether he had serious intentions of resigning or whether he was simply exasperated by opposition, the truth is that a very tangled
12 The following is the important passage in the cable: '. . . We recommend for your serious consideration formation of buying and selling company composed of conference producers and Syndicate in respective proportions of 50 per cent and 50 per cent with the object of taking over from the Syndicate their existing contracts in respect of Namaqualand diamonds including their contract with the Merensky syndicate and Cape Coast Exploration Company, namely Kleinzee, and also of endeavouring to come to terms with Government to purchase diamonds from their Namaqualand claims in which direction Sir Ernest Oppenheimer is now working for Syndicate account on lines that deliveries and payments spread over long period and generally to handle all outside business at present done by Syndicate except contracts at present running with conference producers.'
Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers Page of 688 Ch. 4: Part II: Chairmanship de Beers
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page