Quantcast

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
222
SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
tember 1931; he died in June 1932; F. Hirschhorn had already resigned in December 1930. Lord Bessborough, who had been deputy chairman of De Beers since 1924, also retired in 1931 on being appointed Gover­nor General of Canada. These changes necessarily meant that Ernest Oppenheimer, already eminent both by virtue of his abilities and also through his position, became also the manifest surviving inheritor of the old days and the old traditions of the diamond industry. He had still the aid and support of his brothers in London in facing the new problems; in South Africa he recruited new blood in the persons of Sir Robert Kotze, M.P., previously Chief Government Mining Engineer, and E. H. Farrer, formerly Union Secretary to the Treasury, thus bringing into diamond affairs a new element of expertise of great importance. This expert element was reinforced in London by the appointment to the De Beers board of Sir Basil Blackett, a distinguished Treasury expert and a former finance member of the Government of India.
♦ II ♦
It was obviously in the general interest that the negotiations for new inter-producers' and sales agreements, which began at the beginning of 1930, should be concluded as speedily as possible; delays involved a further undermining of confidence in the future of the industry. In fact, it was not until May 1931 that the Union Government finally ratified the agreements and by that time the international economic situation was much worse than it had been in February 1930, when the first of what in the event was to prove a long series of conferences of various kinds between the industry and the Union Government took place.
By the time the conference of 19 February 1930 was called, the
conference producers and the Syndicate (for it has to be remembered
that the embryo Diamond Corporation was at this stage still only to
be concerned with the 'outside' production)2 had agreed upon draft
terms as regards quotas and sales arrangements: further, it had been
agreed in principle between the Congo producers and the Syndicate
that the then existing arrangements were to be continued for another
period. The general results of the February conference were summed
2 By an agreement dated 10 March 1930 between the conference producers, the Syndi­cate members and the Diamond corporation, all right, title and interests in the 'outside diamonds' were ceded to the corporation, those diamonds, then in the possession of the Syndicate, being valued at £4,811,766 10s. 0d.
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page