Quantcast

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
WORLD CRISIS AND WORLD LEADERSHIP
227
III
During the greater part of the South African autumn and winter of 1930, Ernest Oppenheimer was in Europe. This made for greatly increased correspondence and delay, in view of the very difficult negotiations which were going on with the Union Government; but it meant also that Ernest was in constant personal contact with his brother Louis, with Barnatos and with Rothschilds, and also with the London directors of De Beers. Later, when Ernest had returned to South Africa, the Minister of Mines had gone overseas, and once again negotiations were thereby made more difficult.
Two objectives now dominated his mind: they were the immediate consequence of the crisis through which the industry and the trade were passing, reinforced undoubtedly by the illness of Solly Joel, and the difficulties which might follow upon his decease. These objectives were, first, the unification of the producing side of the industry so far as diamond mining was concerned, under the leadership of De Beers; secondly, the replacement of the Syndicate, as a buying organization, by a buying and selling company or, by what came to the same thing, an 'enlarged' Syndicate. The idea of the unification of the diamond industry under the inspiration of De Beers, had, of course, an historical antecedent: it recalled the efforts of Cecil Rhodes in the early days of the company, but the imminent driving force was, without question, the threatened collapse of the industry if matters were allowed to drift. Naturally, the formation of the 'enlarged' Diamond Corporation in part depended on the successful outcome of the negotiations with Government in regard to the inter-producers' and sales agreements, since the cession of the arrangements with the Diamond Syndicate depended on Government consent, while the reorganization of the internal structure of the industry depended, in the first instance, on winning the assent of his colleagues.
On 16 July 1930 the Kimberley board considered the matter of fuller integration. Ernest Oppenheimer was in London, but the scheme was expressly declared to be his in a cable addressed to the board by the London transfer office, wliich added that 'we consider adoption of this scheme very advisable. N. M. Rothschild and Sons, Rothschild Freres, Paris, and Morgan Grenfell and Company fully agree.' The scheme was complicated. It provided, first, for the acquisition by De Beers from Barnato Brothers of 370,000 shares in the Jagersfontein
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page