Quantcast

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
230
SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
machinery had been created, and that the money to carry colossal stocks of diamonds would always be available. These two things will undoubtedly establish the trade once and for all on a sound basis.
Do not let us shut our eyes to the fact that there are now producers in the world whose production is limited under our agreements. These pro­ducers are capable of producing diamonds much more cheaply than the De Beers company or any other mines. For instance, you have the Govern­ment and the Cape Coast Exploration Company. We know that on Kleinzee there are 600,000 carats of diamonds and we know that the adjoining farms are rich. Then you have the north bank of the Orange River, West Africa and Angola all producing diamonds cheaply.
Under our proposals £10,000,000 remain available for five years, and then become redeemable for the next five years, and the producers would have their own organization and staff to handle the business. . . . We really attempted to carry out the policy which the De Beers company has aimed at for years, and there was no intention of being discourteous to the board. The fact that certain people were induced to leave colossal sums of money in the trade is surely worth some little sacrifice on the part of the producers. If we had been told in London of any definite objections to our proposals we would have dealt with them for we felt that this thorough rationalization of the diamond trade is the only thing to be done. I cannot help feeling that the misunderstanding is due to the unfortunate manner in which we were forced to rush the thing. . . .
The scheme was finally accepted, but Ernest Oppenheimer was over­ruled on the technical issue of finance. The differences of opinion with regard to the method of financing the acquisition of these interests were finally resolved by the issue of debentures.5
The cession of the Syndicate agreements with the conference pro­ducers, though a matter of urgent importance, could not be imple­mented without the assent of the Union Government. But there was, fortunately, nothing to prevent Ernest Oppenheimer from drawing upon his experience as chairman of De Beers, and as the head of Anglo
5 The De Beers annual report for the year ending 30 June 1931 summed up the evolution:
'. . . With reference to the creation of additional deferred shares, authorized by extra­ordinary resolution in December last [1930] for the purpose of acquiring certain share­holdings in other diamond-producing companies, your directors beg to report that, in view of a strong feeling expressed against a permanent addition to the share capital of the company, they decided that it would be advantageous to the company to issue redeemable debentures rather than deferred shares. Consequently ^2,500,000 5J per cent sterling debentures have been created and of this amount ^2,414,600 have been issued, and have been utilized in completing the acquisition of shareholdings in the New Jagersfontein Mining and Exploration Company Limited, the Consolidated Diamond Mines of South West Africa Limited, and the Cape Coast Exploration Limited. . . .'
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page