Quantcast

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
*
WORLD CRISIS AND WORLD LEADERSHIP                      27I
To these representations I was unable to agree, and I intimated to the producers and the Diamond Corporation that if matters were as represented to me the corporation and the producers should act as they thought best in order to keep the trade and industry going and prevent unemployment, without obtaining the specific consent of the Government, leaving the Government jree at any time to call upon the parties to carry out the terms of their agreements as from that time. Under the proposals submitted the producers undertook to keep the mines going until the end of June 1932, provided the replacement figure for the first half of 1932 based on five-eighths of the corporation's total sales of conference producers' and outside diamonds was equal to -£600,000.
In January of this year the Hon. Member for Kimberley [Sir Ernest Oppenheimer], on behalf of the corporation, informed me that as the replacement figure calculated in South African currency was only £450,000-odd, they were not bound by the undertaking given, viz. to continue work­ing the mines on their existing scale till the end of June 1932. (Sales under the sales agreement which form portion of the inter-producers' agreement are calculated in English currency.) I may say that sales by the corporation from 1 January 1932, up to the 6th instant, amounted to £312,000-odd. I had a discussion with Sir Ernest Oppenheimer and other representatives of the industry on the 4th instant and also on a subsequent date when the question of closing down was discussed, but no definite decision was come to and before I was prepared to give my consent, I wanted certain undertakings from the producers regarding reopening. No conclusions were arrived at between the producers and the Govern­ment and I expected to hear further from them with more definite proposals. It was therefore surprising to see the statement in the Press last night. I am unable to say more at present, but the whole question is being very carefully investigated by the Government and it is hoped that it may yet be possible to obviate such drastic action as contemplated by the company. I would just like to add that the Government is still allowing prospecting in the district of Van Rhynsdorp and certain areas of Namaqualand but it is not at present prepared to allow the working of any discoverer's rights.
♦ XI ♦
It was not until 2 March that Ernest Oppenheimer had the oppor­tunity of commenting in the Assembly on this statement. He did so in a brilliant, mordant and devastating speech occupying nearly eight columns of Hansard. He made no attempt to be conciliatory; on the contrary, he made clear his resentment and his bitterness at the treat­ment which he, the Diamond Corporation and the diamond industry had received at the hands of the Minister and of his department, and of
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page