Quantcast

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
WORLD CRISIS AND WORLD LEADERSHIP                      285
(3)    That during 1933 Congo company will not put to us more diamonds than actually required to meet cash working expenses.
(4)    That payments due between September and March next will be spread during that period in equal monthly payments.
Going Lisbon and hope arrive at similar arrangements Angola. Will be back end of July [in London] when anticipate come to satisfactory arrange­ment Selection Trust. In addition to foregoing, I am making every effort to steady market by not showing any goods for some time. Therefore consider if efforts Angola and Selection Trust successful, ground prepared for revival, but think this will only come about if we can arrive at some arrangement with Government which will result in all diamonds being handled in one office in South Africa. It would, therefore, help considerably if you could arrange to have some informal discussions with Pirow or any other person you think suitable with a view to arriving at some workable arrangement such as above. In my opinion failure to arrive at some satisfactory scheme with Government will disappoint market and delay revival.
Sales through a common office implied, of course, something much more far-reaching than a mere technical device: it implied, also, an understanding as to what the basis of sales should be. The real grievance of the conference producers and of the Diamond Corporation lay in the fact that the Government, in pursuing its sales policy, had refused to adhere to the principle which the Syndicate had for decades been trying to enforce—namely, that sales should be made in 'series' and that cutters should not be allowed to pick out particular stones, thus leaving the producers with broken series on their hands. This had been explained to the Government time after time by Ernest Oppenheimer himself: it was to continue to plague the relationships between the Government and the producers for many months to come, even while renewed efforts were being made to come to an understanding. The points involved could not be more clearly set out than they were in a letter addressed to the Minister of Mines eight months later. On 27 February 1933 the secretary of De Beers wrote:
... It is not from any desire to find fault, but in order to clarify a position that is still perhaps obscure and in the confident hope of arriving by a frank interchange of views at a permanent and mutually satisfactory settlement of the trade, that certain comments will now be made on the policy of the Government as a producer and distributor of diamonds.
The Government has always approved of those two fundamental principles of the diamond trade—control of output and sales through one channel— and has even gone so far as to pass legislation taking power, if necessary,
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page