Portal logo
292
SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
proposed international agreement drafted just before the outbreak of World War I, which was rendered abortive by that catastrophe. On 18 November, Ernest Oppenheimer sent the Minister proposals, discussed previously with him, by means of which 'the diamond trade could be put on a permanent and satisfactory basis'; these proposals were expressly stated to be 'only the personal views of Sir Robert and myself'. When later on they were rediscussed with the Minister in December 1932, Sir Basil Blackett joined in the conversations.
The detailed features of the scheme were summed up in a letter addressed to the Minister by Ernest Oppenheimer on 18 November 1932. The essence of the scheme was a pooling arrangement23 of actual stocks and future production of all South African producers and of the actual and future stocks of the Diamond Corporation, accruing from past purchases and future purchases from the outside producers. The Diamond Corporation was to act as the selling agent of the pro­ducers : it was to 'sell only from the selling parcel and the participants to sell only through the pool'. The pool was to be controlled by a board of five; the Government representative was also to be chairman; this was obviously a very considerable concession to the Government. The South West African Government was also to have a separate representative 'on behalf of the producers in that territory'.
Somewhat later, in early December, Ernest Oppenheimer summed up the situation in a memorandum drafted after repeated interviews with the Minister. These conversations were purely exploratory on both sides: an important point that emerged was agreement that the decisions of the proposed pool board were to be unanimous; in case of any disagreement, the matter in dispute was to be referred back to the principals, and ultimately, if necessary, it was to go to arbitration.
23'. . . A re-examination of the projected arrangement in 1914, a copy of which is attached, leaves us convinced that this is an excellent basis for starting our negotiations, and that the principles of that agreement are applicable, though naturally a number of amendments are necessary to meet the changed position that exists today.
'A producers' pool to be formed, which will act as custodian of the whole of the stocks and all future productions of De Beers, Jagersfontein, Premier, Consolidated Diamond Mines, Cape Coast and Koffyfontein companies, and the Union Government. The Diamond Corporation would bring into the producers' pool its stock, including the Merensky diamonds and all future outside purchases, whether from foreign producers or from alluvial and small mines within the Union. The pool to hold the diamonds handed over to it in the first instance separate, but to make up a selling parcel in which each participant will have his agreed proportion or quota, and the diamonds in this parcel to be mixed. The selling parcel to be replenished from time to time from the producers' pool always maintaining the quotas.
'The proceeds of the sales of pool diamonds would be divided among the participants in the producers' pool in proportion to their quotas. . . .'