This chapter is tagged (labeled) with: 

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
298                                     SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
the mining profits of the producers, that is to say the difference between the cost of production and the price at which diamonds are handed over to the pool, liable for this tax. It is a question which will have to be settled by our legal advisers, but it seems probable that the proposals put forward in the draft are not satisfactory. We have given the matter further thought and certain other suggestions will be submitted. . . .
The solution which was ultimately adopted—it appears to have been first put forward by the eminent British legal expert briefed by the Diamond Corporation and De Beers—was the creation of a separate sales company. On 30 May, Sir Frank Meyer was cabling that 'regard­ing income tax there is nothing to add to previous cable, except to emphasize that counsel consider formation of sales company best method to deal with situation. Reference to method of raising capital for sales company, Frank Oppenheimer and I are carefully considering proposal contained in your letter to him.' It must have been a source of great satisfaction to Ernest Oppenheimer that a second generation, in the shape of his own two sons, was now beginning to take an active part in the conduct of affairs. (Harry Oppenheimer, the present head both of De Beers and the Anglo American Corporation, became a director of De Beers on 27 December 1934.) The solution proposed by Ernest Oppenheimer, as he cabled Sir Frank Meyer next day, was for a subsidiary company with a capital of £1 million, the whole capital to be subscribed for and held by the Diamond Corporation, though the corporation was to finance itself for this purpose partly by an addition to its debentures, which were to be taken up by the conference producers. The sales company would 'at once use the money so sub­scribed to buy diamonds from producers and the Diamond Corpora­tion, so that practically the whole sum will return direct to the subscribers in the form of payment for diamonds'.
It was, of course, one thing for the legal experts to arrive at a solution which they hoped would meet the circumstances of the case: it was altogether another matter to get the Union authorities to agree to these proposals. The Minister of Mines was himself an eminent advocate and an ex-revenue official, and, naturally, was fully aware of the absolute necessity of clearing up the legal position and of avoiding, if it were at all possible, the rigours of the British income tax law. Never­theless, he was for a time not convinced of the necessity of the creation of a separate sales company, and, to the consternation of the De Beers group, at one moment toyed with the idea that, to avoid all danger, the selling activities of the Diamond Corporation should be removed from
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page