Quantcast

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
WORLD CRISIS AND WORLD LEADERSHIP
303
Nevertheless, progress was slow: a host of technical points had to be cleared up, and as Farrer, the managing director of the Diamond Corporation, had to point out to Ernest Oppenheimer (by this time in London) on 30 October, while regretting the snail's pace of the negotiations, the 'number [of] officials concerned with details of scheme' made this inevitable. On 13 November he cabled: 'Duncan has written confirming that agreement has been reached between us and him regarding main provisions of association and sales agreements. Administrator's approval still to be obtained, new drafts should have reached him today. Union revenue authorities are satisfied. . . .' As far as London was concerned, the Diamond Corporation had already cabled a fortnight earlier that 'omnibus agreement in final form approved by all parties and will be signed upon receipt of information from your side that relative documents completed'. Unfortunately, it took a great deal more time and more negotiations before 'the relative documents' were completed. The main principles of all the proposed arrangements were again set out in a document forwarded to the Secretary for Mines on 4 December, on the same date the producers and the Diamond Corporation accepted Mr. Duncan's proposal that the chairman of the board of the association should be the Government representative on the board, and suggesting that the South African producers should appoint the chairman of the London committee, their choice being Sir Frank Meyer, the deputy chairman of De Beers. Further delays occurred, this time because the producers themselves desired to make some further changes. The solicitor who had been responsible for the technical drafting was informed that
Mr. Farrer has asked me to write to you to say that it is now almost certain that the agreements cannot be signed until early in the New Year, and, in any case if they are signed before then, they cannot be given effect to until the new standard assortment26 and basic prices are fixed. This work is well advanced, but it will not be possible to complete it before the year end. This being so, the question arises as to what amendments, if any, should be made to the agreements as now drafted. . . . We think that if it is possible to leave the agreements as they are until the board of the association is constituted and the trading company formed and then provide by means of
26 The technical work of making up the assortment was in the hands of Louis Oppen­heimer at Kimberley. Ernest Oppenheimer, who was in London, had sent him a long technical cable on 15 September with regard to the rearrangement of the series and of prices—'so as to bring various qualities into line. You may find that it is advisable to reduce prices better qualities and at the same time increase prices of the goods which are now readily saleable. Should you decide on that course inform us promptly so that we do not sell small quantities of these qualities still in stock too cheaply.'
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page