Quantcast

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
304
SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
letters for things done to which the agreements cannot apply it would per­haps be the most satisfactory course. . . .
This produced a dry response from Mr. Friel that
generally speaking, it is not wise to enter into an agreement and at the same time for the parties to the agreement to write letters to each other stating that notwithstanding certain provisions of the agreement, those provisions are not to be carried out, but some other provisions shall be carried out. . . . We consider the drawing of a letter dealing with all these points would give more trouble than the drawing of amendments to the agreement. In addition there is the very grave objection which we have just referred to, that is, if possible the agreement should set out what the parties intend to carry out in relation to each other and should not contain provisions which they have no intention of carrying out and which at the very moment of signing they have varied by means of a letter.
XVIII
At last, on 7 March 1934, the Mines Department was in a position to cable to the Diamond Corporation that 'association agreement signed behalf Government and by Administrator today. Administrator also signed South West special agreement today.' An additional cause of delay had arisen because the producers had doubts on the subject of the Union Government's choice of the chairman, but at long last the Diamond Producers' Association had come into legal existence, together with the Diamond Trading Company, the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Diamond Corporation. A framework had been created for the diamond industry which, subject to inevitable modifica­tions of detail, has now stood the test of time for a quarter of a century.
The essential feature of the scheme was to push the principles of control of production and sales through a single channel to their logical conclusion. The Diamond Producers' Association was repre­sentative of all the large South African diamond interests—the old 'conference' producers, the Union Government, the Consolidated Diamond Mines, the Cape Coast and Koffiefontein mines and the Diamond Corporation, the last-named both as regards its stock and contracts with outside producers. The outside producers were outside the direct influence of the South African Government; the Diamond Corporation accepted the principle that on the expiration of the then running contracts 'they shall not be extended nor shall fresh contracts
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page