Quantcast

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry

Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
306                                     SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
In relation to the sales of diamonds, the agreement departed from tradition in one radical respect. Under the old inter-producers' agree­ment the Syndicate (and then its successor the Diamond Corporation) had normally to take in each period an amount of diamonds based in a defined manner on sales in a previous period (this was the 'replace­ment clause'). The association was under no such obligation: if it required diamonds for sale 'it shall advise each member of the total quantity in value of the selling parcel it proposes to make up and of the quantity in value which each member is entitled to supply in respect thereof. In fact, the deed of agreement between the association and the Diamond Trading Company provided for the latter buying such an amount of diamonds 'as will maintain the company's stock of diamonds in hand . . .' at £i million, South African currency.
The association and the Diamond Trading Company bound each other to mutual exclusiveness in diamond transactions: the association could only sell to the company, and the company could only buy from the association. (The 'outside' producers' diamonds came into the arrangement through the Diamond Corporation's two quotas: its then existing stock and its current contracts.) As far as it was humanly possible, centralization of buying and selling had been achieved. On the purely technical side, so far as the physical handling of the output was concerned, arrangements were made for the establishment in Kimberley of a central sorting office and for the laying down of a standard assortment. These arrangements, however, did not apply to the Diamond Corporation's purchases of outside diamonds, though any arrangements made in London for the sorting of such diamonds were to satisfy the requirements of the managing board of the Diamond Producers' Association.
The permanent reorganization of the diamond industry was compre­hended in these plans: there were, however, aspects of the situation which concerned more narrowly the financial obligations and servi­tudes of the interested parties, and these also had to be provided for in an agreement dated 23 March 1934. The Diamond Corporation's original issues of debentures at 5I per cent, issued to take over the stock of conference producers' diamonds in the hands of the old Syndicate, had been guaranteed by the conference producers and by the individual member firms of the Diamond Syndicate. This guarantee, so far as the producers were concerned, was in effect worthless in the light of their then financial circumstances. Under the new arrangements, the guarantors were released from their guarantee as regards principal and
Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry Page of 688 Ch. 5: Part III: Worst Crisis in Diamond Industry
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page