Quantcast

Ch. 6: Part IV: War Years and After

Ch. 6: Part IV: War Years and After Page of 688 Ch. 6: Part IV: War Years and After Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
324
SIR ERNEST OPPENHEIMER
must do it step by step. The separation of the business into an industrial and jewellery branch will find ready acceptance. I am working at a memo on this point and the more I study it the more convinced I am that this is the right course.
Harry Oppenheimer was not convinced,10 and this specific suggestion bore no immediate fruit: it was to come up again in later negotiations. But in the framing of the 1943 agreement, the position of industrials was to play a considerable role, when the question of the Diamond Corporation's quotas came to be considered.
He was, about this time, critical of the attitude of the British authoriĀ­ties and critical also of the manner in which the London directors of De Beers and even his brothers, Louis and Otto, were handling affairs. At first he was acquiescent: in October he was writing: 'Government interference in our selling arrangements is growing in England. I have no complaints to make because clearly dollar exchange is of outstandĀ­ing importance and I can also understand that England does not want diamonds used for hoarding.' But a little later on, on 16 November 1941, he was writing,
It is quite clear that London has made a mess of it all; not only do we get no credit for our policy of selling at pre-war rates, but [certain firms] have the ear of the authorities and keep on making continuous demands such as picking our goods and leaving us with the unsaleable portion. The Russian experience, i.e. [the selling firms] submitted parcels to the Board of Trade which we inspected and found that they make 100 per cent profit on their purchases. Our promise was to the British Government and not to dealers.
As to the attitude towards gem stones, he was writing in June 1942, in the course of a long and deeply interesting commentary on the actual and future position,
... I have come to this: if the British Government were to say to me, 'for war purposes black is white', I would say to myself it sounds illogical but they know better. The British Government's action in restricting the cutting industry in England in order to prevent hoarding comes [to my mind] under the above category. The Diamond Corporation has jT 18,000,000 of diamonds in England; what difference could it possibly make to the war effort if some other Englishmen held these diamonds instead of ourselves? The purchasers would have the diamonds and we would have the cash, instead of the reverse position. We are more likely to put the money into
10 'You do not like the idea of a separate Industrial Diamond Corporation nor an Industrial Trading Company and I am not going to rush this matter. I only suggested a separate company because it helps the tax position.' (Ernest Oppenheimer to Harry Oppenheimer, 11 January 1942.)
Ch. 6: Part IV: War Years and After Page of 688 Ch. 6: Part IV: War Years and After
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page