138 THE GREAT DIAMONDS OF THE WORLD.
gem.*
In any case, it seems tolerably certain that the " Darya-i-Nür " was
one of the diamonds carried off by Nadir Shah, when he plundered the
Delhi treasury in 1739. But if it was never associated with the "
Koh-i-Nur," it is now at least fittingly coupled with the "Taj-e-Mah,"
a gem of scarcely inferior splendour, for both of these superb diamonds
figure as the ornaments in a pair of magnificent bracelets, which Sir
John Malcolm tells us he saw in Persia, and which were valued at no
less than one million sterling.
Some
writers have suggested that the " Darya-i-Nür" may possibly be the
missing " Great Mogul," of which nothing has been heard since the time
it was seen by Tavernier in Aurung-zeb's treasury in 1665. Thus Barbot,
amongst others, writes that, " Thamask Kouli-Khan, so famous under the
name of Nadir Shah, seems to have got possession of the ' Great Mogul.'
If so it may now be in Persia, where it is known by the name of '
Darya-i-Nür,' or ' Ocean of Light.'"
But
while it is quite possible, and even probable that Nadir may have
seized the " Great Mogul," it does not at all follow that this diamond
is now represented by the " Darya-i-Nür." On the contrary, the two
stones differ so widely in size and form that they cannot possibly be
the same jewel under two different names. The " Great Mogul," as we
have seen, was reduced in