Quantcast

B.2 Ch. 18: Different Weights for Diamonds at Mines, Price, etc.

B.2 Ch. 18: Different Weights for Diamonds at Mines, Price, etc. Page of 417 B.2 Ch. 18: Different Weights for Diamonds at Mines, Price, etc. Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
chap, xviii THE GREAT MOGUL'S DIAMOND             75
of 1 carat, would not be worth more than 60 or 80 or 100 livres at the most, according to the beauty of the diamond. You must then square the weight of the diamond, i.e. 15 carats, and next multiply the product 125 by the value of the stone of 1 carat, which may for example be 80 livres, and the product, which is 10,000 l livres, is the price of the diamond of 15 carats.
It is easy to see from this the great difference in value between a perfect stone and one which is not so. For if this stone of 15 carats had been perfect, the second multiplication would be by 150, which is the price of a perfect stone of 1 carat, and then it would amount not to 10,000 livres, but to 33,750 livres, i.e. to 23,750 2 livres more than an imperfect diamond of the same weight.
According to this rule, the following is the value of the two largest among the cut stones in the world—one of them in Asia belonging to the Great Mogul, the other in Europe belonging to the Grand Duke of Tuscany—as will be seen by the subjoined figures.
The Great Mogul's diamond weighs 279 9/16 carats, is of perfect water, good form, and has only a small flaw which is in the edge of the basal circumference of the stone. Except for this flaw the first carat would be placed at 160 livres, but on that account I do not estimate it at more than 150, and so calculated according to the above given rule it reaches the sum of 11,723,278 livres, 14 sols, and 3 Hards. If this diamond only weighed 279 carats, it would have been worth 11,676,150 livres only, and thus these 9/16,ths are worth 47,128 livres, 14 sols, 3 liards.3
1  £750. But this calculation, though represented graphically as a sum in figures, in the original, is wholly incorrect, as 15 X 15 = 225, not 125, and the product of its multiplication by 80 is 18,000 instead of 10,000 livres; the value of the diamond consequently would be £1,350. In the edition of Tavernier of 1678, this sum is correctly worked out to 18,000 livres.
2  i. e. £2,531 5s., and £1,781 5s. The former is correctly calculated, but the latter should be 33,750—18,000 livres = 15,750 livres = £1,181 5s.
3  These amounts are equivalent to £879,245 18s. 1 1/2d., £875,711 5s., and £3,534 13s. ld.—the livre being 1s. 6d., and the sol 0.9 d.
B.2 Ch. 18: Different Weights for Diamonds at Mines, Price, etc. Page of 417 B.2 Ch. 18: Different Weights for Diamonds at Mines, Price, etc.
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
Tavernier: Travels in India II
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page