Quantcast

B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls

B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Page of 417 B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
THE GREAT MOGUL'S DIAMOND             335
by a Portuguese who worked the mine at Wajra Karur in Bellary about the beginning of the seventeenth century. It weighed, apparently, 434.7 carats. Nothing of its subse­quent history is known ; but it cannot have been the one presented by Mir Jumla to Shahjahan. It may, however, have been the Pitt diamond, which, when offered to Pitt in 1701, weighed 426 carats ; but if so, it remained uncut for nearly a century, and the generally accepted story of the Pitt diamond is that it was obtained at the mine at Partial.
We may now pass to a brief summary of the facts contained in Tavernier's several independent references to the Great Mogul's diamond—•
First, in order of sequence, after describing the Mogul's jewels, he mentions (vol. i. 315) its weight as being 319 1/2 ratis, or 280 carats, the rati being 7/8 th of a carat. When first presented to Shahjahan by Mir Jumla it weighed, he says, 900 ratis or 787 1/2 carats, and had several flaws, but when he saw it it was round, rose cut, very steep at one side, with a notch on the basal margin, and an internal flaw ; its water was beautiful.1
Secondly, when describing (vol. ii. 58) the mine of Kollur (Gani or Coulour) he says that there was found in it the great diamond which weighed 900 carats (?) before cutting, and was presented to Aurangzeb (?) by Mir Jumla. This account, as already pointed out, contains several mistakes. Tavernier adds that the mine had been opened 100 years previously.
Thirdly (vol. ii. 75), he states that the Great Mogul's diamond was of perfect water and good form, and weighed 279 9/16 carats. Its value he estimated as amounting to 11,723,278 livres, 14 sols, 3 liards, or £879,245 18s. \\d. If it had weighed 279 carats only it would have been worth 11,676,150 livres, and consequently the value of the 9/16th of a carat, owing to the geometrical method of calculation, amounted to 47,128 livres, 14 sols, 3 liards, or £3,534 13s. 1 1/2\d.
Fourthly (vol. ii. 97), he states that he was permitted to weigh the diamond, and ascertained its weight to be 319J ratis, or 279 9/16 carats, and adds, ' when in the rough it weighed, as I have elsewhere said, 907 ratis, or 793 5/8 carats'. Its form was as of an egg cut in two.
Tavernier's figure of the diamond (see Plate II) has been referred to by Mr. King as being carefully drawn. It is true that very neat representations of it have appeared in works on mineralogy and precious stones, and glass models have been made on the same lines, but the original figure can only
1 The Ma'asir-nl-umara ii. 535, gives the weight of this diamond as 216 surkh, or 9 tank, and values it at Bs. 216,000, or £21,600. Manucci says that it weighed 360 carats (Manucci, i. 237).
B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Page of 417 B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
Tavernier: Travels in India II
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page