Quantcast

B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls

B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Page of 417 B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
338              THE GREAT MOGUL'S DIAMOND
Apart from the discrepancy in the weights and in the size, as shown by Tavernier's drawing, which was intended to represent the natural size of the former, it is tolerably certain that the Orloff was obtained from the temple of Srlrangam on an island in the Cauvery river, in Mysore. It was there­fore a possession of the Hindus, and it is most improbable that it ever belonged to the Moguls.
Reference has been made by some authors to the long historical chain which, they say, connects Babur's diamond with the Koh-i-Nur. As to the length of the supposed chain, it would extend over a period of 500 years at the least; but as to the links composing it, there is this to be said—they are all utterly unsound. In making so emphatic a statement I feel the necessity of being very sure of the grounds of my argument, especially as it is opposed to the views of many authorities, who, however, do not agree with one another as to details.
In deference to the opinions of Erskine, Professor Maskelyne, and General Cunningham, it may no doubt with perfect safety be admitted that the weight of Babur's diamond in 1526 was, as stated above, about 8 mishkals or 320 ratis, and that these were equivalent to about 186 or 187 modern English carats. But it must be at once plainly stated that there is no direct evidence that any diamond of that weight was in the possession of the Mogul emperors at any subsequent period, up to the time of Nadir Shah's invasion. We know nothing as to the weight of the Koh-i-NGr, as such, till about the time it was brought to England, namely, the year 1850 ; and then, although its weight was 186 1/6 carats, the trust­worthy evidence, as to its condition at that time, as will be seen, is to the effect that it was not identical with Babur's diamond.
In order to put this clearly it is necessary to summarize what has already been stated about other diamonds. Those mentioned by Garcia da Orta were not apparently in the possession of the Mogul, and their weights do not correspond to those of either the Mogul's or Babur's diamonds. The diamond of 187| carats referred to by De Boot has been shown to be mythical. Again, Tavernier did not see any stone of the weight above attributed to Babur's diamond in the possession of the Great Mogul, Aurangzeb, nor can we suppose that he heard of any such diamond being in the possession of Shahjahan, who was then confined in prison, where he retained a number of jewels in his own possession.1 If either he or Bernier had heard of such a stone he would surely have mentioned it. It is possible, that Babur's diamond may have been in Shahjahan's possession when 1 See vol. i. 295.
B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Page of 417 B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
Tavernier: Travels in India II
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page