Quantcast

B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls

B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Page of 417 B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
SUMMARY HISTORY OF THE KOH-I-NUR 345
exchange of turbans took place, the diamond was surrendered, and the Shah received the assignment of a jagtr in the Punjab for his maintenance, and a promise of aid in recovering Kabul'.1 This was in 1813 : the Shah then escaped from Lahore to Rajaurl, in the hills, and from thence to Ludhiana, after suffering great privations.1 Here he and his brother Shah Zaman were well received by the Honourable East India Company, and a liberal pension was assigned by the Govern­ment for their maintenance. The above statements, except where other authorities are quoted, are taken from General Sleeman's3 account, which was founded on a narrative by Shah Zaman, the blind old king himself, who communicated it to General Smith, he being at the time in command of the troops at Ludhiana.
In the year 1839 Shah Shuja', under Lord Auckland's Government, was set up on the throne of Kabul by a British force, which two years later was annihilated during its retreat.
The testimony of all the writers up to this period, and, it is said, the opinions of the jewellers of Delhi and Kabul also, concur in the view that the diamond which Ranjit thus acquired was the Mogul's, i. e. the one described by Tavernier. It seems probable that the mutilation and diminution in weight by about 83 carats, to which, as we have shown, it was subjected (see p. 342), took place while it was in the possession of Shah Rukh, Shah Zaman, or Shah Shuja', whose necessities may have caused one of them to have pieces removed to furnish him with money.                              .
Ranjit during his lifetime often wore the diamond on state occasions, and it is referred to by many English visitors to Lahore, who saw it during this period.4 It is said to have then been dull and deficient in lustre.
In 1839 Ranjit died, and on Ms deathbed expressed a wish that the diamond, then valued at one million sterling, should be sent to Jagannath,5 but this intention was not carried out,6 and the stone was placed in the jewel chamber till the infant Raja Dhalip Singh was acknowledged as Ranjit's successor.
1  Cunningham, History of the Sikhs, Oxford, 1918, p. 153. The Shah's own account (Autobiography, chap, xxv) of Ranjit's methods to get possession of the diamond is more favourable to the latter than Captain Murray's. (See his Rangeet Singh, 96.)
2  Dr. W. L. M'Gregor, History of the Sikhs, London, 1847, i. 170.
3  Rambles and Recollections of an Indian Official, 288 ff.
4  Dr. M'Gregor, History of the Sikhs, London, 1847, i. 216 ; Baron C. von Hugel, Travels in Kashmir and the Panjab, 1845, p. 303.
8 Lieut.-Colonel Steinbach, The Punjab, London, 1846, p. 16. • Miss Eden, Up the Country, ii. 130, says that the Maharaja ultimately consented to its not being sent.
B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls Page of 417 B.3 A. I: Great Moguls, Koh-i-Nur, & Florentine Diamonds and Pearls
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
Tavernier: Travels in India II
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page