Ch. 16: Formation of the Diamond

Ch. 16: Formation of the Diamond Page of 396 Ch. 16: Formation of the Diamond Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
FORMATION OF THE DIAMOND
133
is no doubt in the mind of any one who has had practical experience in finding these fragments that they were not crystal­lized where they are found. The fact that no diamond has ever been found embedded in the shale itself strikes one as conclusive proof that Professor Lewis's theory is wrong.
Again, would not the intrusion of an igneous rock through carbonaceous shales have altered these shales in the vicinity of the igneous rock? There is, however, no difference that can be detected between the shales at the junction of the pipe and at a distance of one thousand feet. Moreover, would not the frag­ments of shale enclosed in the blue ground have changed, and have lost the carbon which they contain, if diamonds were formed from them ? One sees no difference between the shale which forms the country rock, and the fragments embedded in the blue ground. If such a theory as is attributed to Professor Lewis by Mr. Kunz had a shadow of foundation, it is dis­pelled by the occurrence of diamonds in the Jagersfontein mine in the Orange Free State, some eighty miles from Kimberley. The rocks surrounding this mine are gray shale from the surface to the depth of twenty feet, and then basalt as far as developed. It is apparent that no carboniferous shales ever existed here, or
Ch. 16: Formation of the Diamond Page of 396 Ch. 16: Formation of the Diamond
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page