this subject, but all are difficult to follow, because the writers upon these
things use strange names, which do not properly belong to the metals, and
because some of them employ now one name and now another, invented by
themselves, though the thing itself changes not. These masters teach their
disciples that the base metals, when smelted, are broken up ; also they teach
the methods by which they reduce them to the primary parts and
remove whatever is superfluous in them, and by supplying what is
wanted make out of them the precious metals—that is, gold and silver,—
all of which they carry out in a crucible. Whether they can do these things
or not I cannot decide ; but, seeing that so many writers assure us with all
earnestness that they have reached that goal for which they aimed, it would
seem that faith might be placed in them ; yet also seeing that we do not
read of any of them ever having become rich by this art, nor do we now see
them growing rich, although so many nations everywhere have produced, and
are producing, alchemists, and all of them are straining every nerve night and
day to the end that they may heap a great quantity of gold and silver, I should
say the matter is dubious. But although it may be due to the carelessness
of the writers that they have not transmitted to us the names of the masters
who acquired great wealth through this occupation, certainly it is clear that
their disciples either do not understand their precepts or, if they do understand them, do not follow them ; for if they do comprehend them, seeing that
these disciples have been and are so numerous, they would have by to-day filled
give anything but the most casual notes as to the personages here mentioned and their
writings. Aside from the classics and religious works, the libraries of the Middle Ages teemed
with more material on Alchemy than on any other one subject, and since that date a neverending stream of historical, critical, and discursive volumes and tracts devoted to the old
Alchemists and their writings has been poured upon the world. A collection recently sold
in London, relating to Paracelsus alone, embraced over seven hundred volumes.
Of many of the Alchemists mentioned by Agricola little is really known, and no
two critics agree as to the commonest details regarding many of them ; in fact, an endless
confusion springs from the negligent habit of the lesser Alchemists of attributing the authorship of their writings to more esteemed members of their own ilk, such as Hermes, Osthanes, etc.,
not to mention the palpable spuriousness of works under the names of the real philosophers,
such as Aristotle, Plato, or Moses, and even of Jesus Christ. Knowledge of many of the
authors mentioned by Agricola does not extend beyond the fact that the names mentioned
are appended to various writings, in some instances to MSS yet unpublished. They may
have been actual persons, or they may not. Agricola undoubtedly had perused such
manuscripts and books in some leading library, as the quotation from Boerhaave given later
shows. Shaw (A New Method of Chemistry, etc., London, 1753. Vol. I, p. 25) considers
that the large number of such manuscripts in the European libraries at this time were
composed or transcribed by monks and others living in Constantinople, Alexandria, and
Athens, who fled westward before the Turkish invasion, bringing their works with them.
For purposes of this summary we group the names mentioned by Agricola, the first
class being of those who are known only as names appended to MSS or not identifiable at
all. Possibly a more devoted student of the history of Alchemy would assign fewer names to
this department of oblivion. They are Maria the Jewess, Orus Chrysorichites, Chanes,
Petasius, Pebichius, Theophilus, Callides, Veradianus, Rodianus, Canidés, the maiden
Taphnutia, Johannes, Augustinus, and Africanus. The last three are names so common as not
to be possible of identification without more particulars, though Johannes may be the Johannes
Rupeseissa (1375), an alchemist of some note. Many of these names can be found among
the Bishops and Prelates of the early Christian Church, but we doubt if their owners would
ever be identified with such indiscretions as open, avowed alchemy. The Theophilus
mentioned might be the metal-working monk of the 12th Century, who is further discussed
in Appendix Β on Ancient Authors.
In the next group fall certain names such as Osthanes, Hermes, Zosimus, Agathodaemon,
and Democritus, which have been the watchwords of authority to Alchemists of all ages.
These certainly possessed the great secrets, either the philosopher's stone or the elixir.
