A gem, as I have said, is exceptionally hard and transparent, as the diamond and smaragdus, or it is exceptionally beautiful because it is adorned with pleasing or variable colors as most species of jaspis. Transparency,
unusual beauty of color, luster and brilliancy are, in great part,
responsible for the value. However, even though some congealed juices
such as salt, nitrum, alumen and atramentum sutorium are
transparent they cannot be numbered among the gems because they are not
hard and for the same reason gypsum and silver-colored mica which are
also transparent. Nor the stones which melt in a fire although they
have the same colors and are as transparent as gems. Tephrites, diphyes, enorchis, crypto-petra, tecolithos and
similar stones are not classed as gems because they cannot be cut, they
are not brilliant, nor are they adorned with beautiful or variable
colors. For the same reasons asbestos, bostrychites, corsoides, polia and spartopolios which are names for asbestos are not regarded as gems. On the other hand hematite, lysimachia, arabica, alabastrites, meroctes, obsidianus, siderites and
similar stones are classed as gems because these stones as well as
small fragments of marble are cut and polished and to a limited extent
set in rings. However we will not treat these minerals here. A small
piece of hematite does not differ from a large mass either in color or
porperties, only in size. Lysimachia is the same as Rho-dian marble; arabica, as Arabian marble; capnites, as marble with smoky spirals; alabastros, as alabastrites; exhebenus, as samius lapis; obsidiana which is also called samothracia, as obsidianus; meroctes, as thyites; and siderites, as basaltes. I
have already discussed amber, which Pliny correctly classifies as a
gem, in Book IV as well as those minerals which are either amber or at
least consist of bitumen. In this genus are anatachates, aroma-tites, myrrhites, zanthenes, baptes, atizoe, catochites and lipare. I have discussed coral which Pliny calls gorgonia and, as it appears to me, crocallis. I have mentioned spongites, syringites and phycites and therefore will say nothing about them here.
Certain
minerals having the distinct qualities of gems do not deserve to be
placed among the gems because they do not form definite species, for
example, it falls to many gems to be distinguished by one line or more.
Thus jaspis is called grammatias when one line runs through it and poly-grammos when
there are many lines running through it. Any other gem could be called
by these same names if marked the same way. If a white line runs
through the middle of any colored gem this is called mesoleucos, if a black line, mesomelas, if a green line it could be called mesochloros and
if of some other color, by any similarly appropriate name. When a thin
white line runs from the top to the base of a gem it is called perileucos, with a black line it could be called perimelas and with a line of another