The diamond is a non-conductor of electricity, while graphite and charcoal, substances identical in chemical constituents
with this gem, are very active conductors. Both in a natural
and polished condition, it acquires positive electricity by friction,
while, on the contrary, most precious stones are negative
in the rough, and positive only when polished. It does not
possess double refraction ; neither does it polarize light, as do
some other gems. But it is the exceptional one that exhibits
phosphorescence in a natural state, and then only in the case
of certain stones, though this property is said to be generated
by steeping in hot water.
During the last century, it was shown that double refraction never occurs in non-crystallized substances, nor in crystals of the cubic system, to which the diamond is allied.
Haiiy confirmed this opinion, and maintained the converse,
that all crystals not of the cubic system were doublerefracting.
No solvents, not even acids, have the slightest influence in
decomposing the diamond — a fact which enhances its value as
an ornamental stone. Until the middle of the seventeenth
century, it was believed to be incapable of injury from heat, but
Sir Isaac Newton believed it was combustible, before it was
submitted to the operation of burning, on account of its refracting power. The relative density of quartz and diamond
are as three to four, while their refractive powers are as three
to eight.
The experiment of publicly burning the diamond was successfully made at Florence in 1694, by means of a burningglass,* when some of the most celebrated scientists attended
as witnesses of the important ceremony. The stone, on ex-
* MM. Dumas and Strass, it is said, burned this gem by means of the voltaic
battery, an experiment often repeated in modern laboratories.