Quantcast

Ch. 3: Antiquity of the Pearl

Ch. 3: Antiquity of the Pearl Page of 358 Ch. 3: Antiquity of the Pearl Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
THE PEARL
knowledge of those countries, but we have nothing recorded which penetrates the past beyond three to four hundred years B. C, for there is not as much mention made of them in ancient writings familiar to the West as of other precious stones. Nevertheless the pearl is among the most ancient in the nomenclature of jewels because when it did come to be written of only the one thing could be meant. Nature produces nothing similar with which it could be confounded, whereas it is not certain that the diamond, ruby, and other stones as we know them, were intended when the names by which we designate them were used. Such indis­criminate use of names has been made by translators that it is difficult to determine what the stones really were about which ancient authors wrote. The names of those in the Jewish High Priest's breastplate, given in our English version of the Old Testament, undoubt­edly misrepresent the stones actually used, and the only thing authorities agree upon regarding the names is that they are incorrect.
As there was no definite knowledge of the crystallography and chemistry of stones in
56
Ch. 3: Antiquity of the Pearl Page of 358 Ch. 3: Antiquity of the Pearl
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page