Sciene and the Bible

Sciene and the Bible Page of 177 Sciene and the Bible Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
1856.]                      Science and the Bible.                          103
Deity is not Nature itself, which is only a plan in develop­ment, but a personal being above Nature, while ever in na­ture by his power and wisdom.
Our conclusion therefore is, that Nature, self-existent and self-propagating, now and then requiring a jog from the su­pernatural, may be an interesting myth, but cannot rise to the same point of view with Biblical truth or sound philosophy.
But let us pass on. We need better argument than Prof. Lewis has brought forward, to convince us that the phrase, " In the beginning," does not mean what it says. We have regarded the announcement, in the first verse, of creation out of nothing by the will of God, a will free, supreme, omnific, as the grand point distinguishing the Mosaic cosmogony from the Egyptian and all others; almost like the very hand itself of God on the first line of the new revelation. But he would have us suppose that matter was made at some earlier beginning; and perhaps had had its ups and downs, and finally was worked over at a new beginning announced in the first verse. It is true the Hebrew word used in this place for create, does not signify, necessarily, creation out of nothing. Yet such an inference cannot be resisted without doing violence to the spirit of the text, and the fundamental laws of human belief. We would ask Prof. Lewis, what Hebrew word he could substitute for the one used, that would convey the precise idea of creation out of nothing ? When he has found such a one, his reasoning may then de­mand consideration. " In the beginning " refers directly to the existing "heavens and earth" mentioned in the following part of the verse; that is, the existing universe. We may suspect the existence of a previous universe that came to nought before this began ; but it cannot be made a question of reasonable belief, or a basis for argument.
Some other points in Professor Lewis's cosmology (he will excuse us if we substitute his own name for the term "scriptural") demand from us a passing remark.
"V\ ith singular inconsistency, Professor Lewis admits a "huge nebulosity" for the "formless and void" state of the earth, makes the progress mainly one by natural causes, and
Sciene and the Bible Page of 177 Sciene and the Bible
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
Dana. Science and The Bible.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page