sidered as especially adapted for the preservation of the unguenta, or
perfumed oils, then so much in use, it was worked up into the little
vases called alabastra (or "without handles"), and thereby becoming
known as the alabastrites, or " unguent-jar stone," lost its
original désignation of Onyx, which thenceforward came to be confined
to the gem now to be discussed.
The
first mention of the Onyx as a precious stone occurs in the
inscriptions of the Parthenon, dating from the Pelo-ponnesian War (b.c. 431-404), where, amongst the offerings is registered " a large Onyx engraved with an antelope; weight 33 draehms." Theophrastus ('On Stoues,' 31) uses the diminutive ïíý÷éïí, indicative
of its value, and also perhaps to distinguish it from the marble Onyx ;
and describes it as made up of white and dark-brown (<£<ûoç) in
alternate layers. This ûíí÷éïí of Theophrastus and the early Greeks was not the stone known to the Romans and to lis as the Onyx, or Nicolo (the Italian corruption of Ouijculus), but
the gem upon which the best archaic and Etruscan intagli for the most
part occur, and which is now commonly called the Tricoloured Agate.
This appears from the description above quoted from Theophrastus. His
definition of oue of its shades as öáÀïò gives the very epithet
Homer frequently applies to spring-water, and therefore can only
signify something blackish and at the same time translucent, the actual
appearance presented by water deep and clear. Totally inapplicable are
these terms to the Onyx of the Romans, our Nicolo, where the layers are
opaque, and usually of vivid colours, blue horizontally superimposed
upon black; but they exactly describe the appearance of what is
universally called by dactylio-graphers the " Tricoloured, or Banded,
Agate," that so favourite material with the early Glyptic art, and
which the primitive lapidaries invariably cut across the strata, so as to