inclosing
proper names in Egyptian hieroglyphics—the identical form we should
have expected in a piece of jewelry executed under similar historical
circumstances. As to their arrangement according to their species, no
better authority can be adduced than that of Josephus, a writer who
from his position had frequent opportunities of inspecting the
original, both when in use and when deposited in the Temple of Peace in
Borne, and whose description moreover could, for three centuries at
least after, be verified by any of his readers who was inquisitive upon
the subject. His list, too, is confirmed by that given in the Vulgate,
an authority also of weight in such a matter, being written at a time,
the fifth century, when the knowledge of precious stones, and of the
true meaning of their Hebrew appellations, may be supposed to have
been still maintained.
1st Row.—Sardius, red; Topazius, yellowish green ; Sma-ragdus, bright green.
2nd Row.—Carbunculus, red ; Sapphirus, blue ; Jaspis, green.
3rd Row.—Ligurius (lyncurium), yellow ; Achates, black and white ; Amethystus, purple.
4th Row.—Chrysolithus, yellow ; Onyx, blue and black ; Beryllus, pale green, or pale blue.
Our version gives a different arrangement,* but the stones the same with one exception ; it substitutes the Diamond for
the Chrysolithus, a most absurd exchange, for besides its being totally
beyond the power of any ancient engraver to bave inscribed the tribe
upon this invincible substance, a Diamond to correspond in dimensions
with the rest of the stones in the Breastplate must have exceeded the
Koh-i-noor