372 IVORY AND THE ELEPHANT
inches
of bone, the surface is soaked with thin shellac. When dry this imparts
surprising hardness. The surface is then covered with strips of
shellacked rice paper, or with strong paper or cloth dipped in plaster
of Paris. This sets at once and a fresh surface is exposed and treated
in a like manner. The whole is then "cinched" or bound with strips of
gunny sack dipped in plaster of Paris. This stony covering is so
protective that bones may be shipped in entire safety to the
laboratory.
The
tusks of early mastodons are instantly recognized by a longitudinal
band of enamel. This band, about 1 to 2 in. broad in the earlier
Nebraska mastodons, began to decrease in width until it was scarcely a
quarter of an inch wide in Tetrabelodon willistoni. In Eubelodon morrilli and Mammut americanum it
had disappeared altogether. It is said, however, that a bit of enamel
still persists as an interesting vestige on the tips of the young of
living elephants, but this is soon worn off.
In
all fossil tusks the structure and decussations are like that of modern
ivory. Sometimes the tusks are as pure and white as ivory itself, but
do not possess its strength. Due to mineralization, they may be hard,
and occasionally dark in colour, though generally gray. In rare
instances tusks are silicified. In one instance a portion of a mammoth
tusk from Brown County was converted into that variety of mineral known
as odontolite, or "bone turquoise." Three beautiful gems were cut from
this material.
As
compared with living elephants, the early Nebraska mastodons had
proportionally longer bodies and necks, but noticeably shorter limbs.
Their successors, the mammoths, had compact, short bodies and necks,
and long pillarlike limbs. The most striking difference between our
early and late Nebraska elephants lies in the long skulls and jaws of
the former and the short skulls and jaws of the latter.