Quantcast

Ch. 1: Diamonds

Ch. 1: Diamonds Page of 364 Ch. 1: Diamonds Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
UNITED STATES, CANADA AND MEXICO                           23
plank trough set with a steep pitch. An iron grating at its lower end closes it so as to form an obtuse angle. The detritus from the gold-bearing streams is shovelled into this box, and a second operator stirs it with a shovel under a small stream of water. The coarser gravel is thrown out, and the gold, and such small gravel as may possess a superior gravity, do not pass off with the cur­rent. It was thus that this diamond was detained. In April, 1887, Lewis M. Parker, a tenant of Daniel Light, found a dia­mond on his farm, situated three-quarters of a mile northeast of Morrow's Station, Clayton County. The stone afterwards came into the possession of W. W. Scott, of Atlanta, who sent it to me for examination. It proved to be an octahedral crys­tal weighing 4 1/12 carats (12.672 grains), 2/5 of an inch long and 1/4 of an inch wide (9 x iox 7 millimeters), is slightly yellow and has one small black inclusion. It would afford a stone from 1 1/2 to 2 carats in weight. Its specific gravity is 3.527. Its surface is curiously marked with long, shallow pittings. L. O. Stevens, of Atlanta, Ga., has communicated to the writer that a negro called on him during the past year with a 2-carat diamond, defective and of very poor color, which he had found in his garden a few miles from Atlanta. He showed no desire to sell the stone or loan it for examination.
A book by Dr. M. F. Stephenson1 records some of the exag­gerated accounts of Georgia diamonds that have been given in good faith, but upon mere hearsay evidence, and often after years have passed. Although diamonds have been found in Geor­gia, and the smaller ones mentioned are doubtless genuine, yet it is certain that in some instances Dr. Stephenson was unable to discriminate between a paste imitation and a genuine stone, and his enthusiasm may have overreached his judgment in other cases. The large specimens described were evidently quartz crystals and not diamonds. This is almost certain as to the one mentioned which was used for a marker in a game of marbles and bore con­siderable concussion, as a diamond could not withstand this con­cussion without cleaving, whereas a rolled quartz pebble would bear a good deal of such treatment. It is possible that quartz crystals without any prismatic faces, like those found in Arizona (hexag-
1 Geology and Mineralogy of Georgia, Atlanta, 1871.
Ch. 1: Diamonds Page of 364 Ch. 1: Diamonds
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page