Quantcast

Ch. 12: Pearls

Ch. 12: Pearls Page of 364 Ch. 12: Pearls Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
UNITED STATES, CANADA AND MEXICO
251
Perforated pearls were found by Dr. Edwin H. Davis* on the hearths of five distinct groups of mounds in Ohio, and sometimes in such abundance that they could be gathered by the hundred. They werei generally of irregular form, mostly pear-shaped, though perfectly round ones were also found among them. The smaller specimens measured about 1/4 of an inch in diameter, but the largest had a diameter of 3/4 of an inch.
According to this same authority, pearl-bearing shells occur in the rivers of the region whose antiquities are described, but not in such abundance that they could have furnished the amount discovered in the tumuli, and the pearls of these fluvia-tile shells, moreover, are said to be far inferior in size to those recovered from the altars. The latter, it was erroneously thought, were derived from the Atlantic coast and from that of the Mexican Gulf.
The Indians of Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and the other Southern States, subsisted largely on oysters, clams, and conchs, as shown by the numerous refuse piles and shell heaps that abound upon the salt-water creeks. It is not matter of surprise that the Indians, as they opened these shells, should have carefully watched for pearls, and from the vast numbers examined, should have accumulated a store. If the shores of Carolina, Georgia, and Florida did not afford the larger and more highly-prized pearls, it is not improbable that pearls from the islands and lower portions of the Gulf of Mexico, and even from the Pacific Ocean, may have found their way into the heart of Georgia and Florida and into more northern localities, to be there bartered away for skins and other articles. The replies of Indians to Father Hennepin and others, and the presence in remote localities of beads, ornaments, and drinking-cups made of marine shells and conchs, still peculiar to the Gulf of Mexico, confirm the truthfulness of this suggestion.5
But marine shells are not the only source whence the southern Indians derived their pearls. The fluviatile mussels contributed perhaps more freely than other shells to the treas-
1 See Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, by Ephraim G. Squier and Edwin H. Davis (Washington, 1848), p. 232.
' Ancient Aboriginal Trade in North America, by Charles Rau. Report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1872 (Washington, 1873).
Ch. 12: Pearls Page of 364 Ch. 12: Pearls
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page