Quantcast

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1905

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1905 Page of 64 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1905 Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
GOLD AND SILVER.
115
The production of gold in the United States for 1906 was 4,266,742 fine ounces, or 132,680 kilograms, equivalent to $88,180,700. This represents an increase of 373,262 ounces, or $7,716,000, over the production of 1904. The rapid advance in gold pro­duction which began in 1892, but temporarily halted from 1901 to 1903, was resumed in 1904. This increase in 1904 over the output of 1903 was approximately $7,000,000, and in all probability the increase in 1906 over 1905 will be at least the same amount. The chief sources of the great increase are as follows: Alaska added about $6,000,000 to its output of $9,160,458 in 1904, and Colorado, Nevada, and Utah added about $1,000,000 each to their product of the previous year. On the other hand, decreases are noted in Arizona, Idaho, and other States. The States producing over $1,000,000 in gold rank at present in the following order: Colorado, California, Alaska, South Dakota, Nevada, Utah, Montana, Arizona, Oregon, and Idaho.
The production of silver in the United States for 1905 was 56,101,600 fine ounces, or 1,713,852 kilograms, equivalent to $34,221,976, at an average price of 61 cents per fine ounce. In comparison with the figures of' the Bureau of the Mint in 1904, this represents a decrease of 1,581,200 ounces, but in spite of this the increase in the average price of 4 cents per ounce (from 57 in 1904 to 61 in 1905) effected an addition to the value in 1904 of $765,952. Two years of better prices for silver have thus far failed to stimulate the production. The record figures were attained in 1892, when the output was 63,500,000 fine ounces, valued at $55,662,500. A still further advance to a maximum of somewhat over 70 cents has taken place in 1906, but it is not likely that the year will show startling additions to the output for 1905. The increase should be more marked in 1907, and will probably be rather derived from copper ores and dry silver ores than from lead ores.
The decrease in the quantity of silver is specially noticeable in Colorado and Utah; to a slight degree also in Montana. On the other hand, Nevada and Idaho materially increased their output. The States producing over 1,000,000 ounces rank at present as follows: Montana, Colorado, Utah, Idaho, Nevada, Arizona, and California.
A review by States brings out the more important details.
Alaska.—The great increase of $5,765,100 in gold is chiefly due to the new Fair­banks placer district-on the Tanana, in the Yukon Basin, while the Nome placers and the quartz mines on the Pacific coast belt show moderate additions to their pre­vious yield. The copper ores yielded for the first time a considerable quantity of silver with some gold. The total production of gold in Alaska is estimated at $14,925,600.
Arizona.—The moderate decline in the gold production of Arizona is due to the temporary suspension of operation on the part of some important mines in the Yava­pai districts, south of Prescott. An important decrease is also noted from Yuma County. The total yield in gold is $2,691,300. The silver output also shows mod­erate decline. Renewed activity at the recently unwatered Tombstone mines is offset by decrease in the Yavapai districts. The total yield is estimated at 2,605,700 ounces.
California.—The continued development of the dredging industry in the State is responsible for a moderate increase in the production of gold, which now has reached $19,197,100. The great increase noted in 1904 was, however, not repeated in 1905. Less gold than in 1904 was yielded by the old productive counties of Tuolumne, Placer, Kern, and San Diego, while Amador, Trinity, Nevada, and Sierra show an increase. Nevada County, which includes the Grass Valley district, still leads with an output ot over $3,000,000. Most notable are the favorable changes in the dredg­ing counties of Butte, Yuba, and Sacramento.
A decided decline in the silver production is traceable to lessened output of sili­ceous ores in Kern County and of copper ores in Shasta County. Great activity pre­vails, however, in the copper districts at the present time, and a much larger silver production from copper ores is in view within two or three years.
Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1905 Page of 64 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1905
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
US Geol. Surv. 1905. Gemstones, Metals.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
bullet Tag
This Page