Ch. 3: Precious Gem stones in 1905

Ch. 3: Precious Gem stones in 1905 Page of 64 Ch. 3: Precious Gem stones in 1905 Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
PRECIOUS STONES.
1325
of the Pacific coast and the Atlantic States have been derived by erosion from the adjacent mountain ranges, but the original sources have never been dis­covered. Those of the northern drift have doubtless come from beyond our borders, in Dominion territory, and their exact source is entirely a matter of speculation. The few occurrences in Tennessee and Kentucky are not as yet definitely traceable, even in theory. All have been found in loose and superficial deposits, and all acciilentally. Most of those in the Atlantic and Pacific regions have been met with in washing for gold.
This subject of the occurrence of diamonds in the United States has been Treated in some detail by the writer in a report to the United States Geological Survey, to be issued in the near future.
SEARCH FOR DIAMONDS IN BLACK SANDS OF THE UNITED STATES.
The high price of diamonds has made the search for these precious stones in the United States and Canada keener than ever before. In the examination by the United States Geological Survey of many samples of gold and platinum sands during the Lewis and Clark Exposition at Portland, Oreg. diamonds were carefully looked for. Diamonds have been watched for also by a number of parties that have been dredging for gold on an extensive scale in the rivers of California, but in neither case have any finds been reported.
INDIANA.
Minerals of the Indiana drift in relation to their supposed Canadian source.— The only well-attested diamond discoveries in the drift region of the United States during the last four years have been those in connection with the gold washings of Brown and Morgan counties, in southern central Indiana. The writer has taken special pains to obtain a full series of specimens of the rocks and minerals found in the gold-bearing drift of this region from Mr, George C. Royce. of Martinsburg. \V. Va., and Professor Blatchley, State geologist of Indiana, and others, for the purpose of having them compared with the rocks in Canada, north of the Great Lakes, with a view to tracing out, if possible, the source whence the diamonds came.
With the hope of aiding in the solution of this problem the collections of drift minerals and rocks from the diamond section of Indiana were sent to Canada for examination and were laid before the Ottawa meeting of the Geo­logical Society of America in December. 1005. Considerable discussion was awakened, lint no very definite results have as yet been reached.
Among those who examined the specimens at the meeting with particular interest and expressed opinions thereon are the following Canadian geologists : Dr. A. E. Barlow. Mr. W. J. Wilson, and Prof. II. M. Ami, of the geological sur­vey of Canada: Prof. W. G. Miller, of the Ontario Bureau of Mines; Dr. G. A. Young, petrographer. and subsequently in more detail, Prof. Frank D. Adams, of McGill University, at Montreal. All these gentlemen were especially quali­fied to judge of these materials by intimate acquaintance with the geology of the region under consideration and its glacial phenomena.
Doctor 'Barlow and Mr. Wilson recognized a number of the fragments in the collection from the Indiana drift as apparently identical with rocks familiar to them at various points in northern Ontario. Especially marked was the preva­lence of pieces and rolled pebbles of jasper and jaspilite, characteristic in asso­ciation with the iron ores of the Michipicoten and other iron ranges north of Lake Superior.
Ch. 3: Precious Gem stones in 1905 Page of 64 Ch. 3: Precious Gem stones in 1905
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
US Geol. Surv. 1905. Gemstones, Metals.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
bullet Tag
This Page