Quantcast

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906 Page of 77 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906 Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
120                                     MINERAL RESOURCES.
Alaska.—Alaska expanded its gold production in 1906 to $22,036,-794, an increase of $6,406,794 over 1905. The placers in the Yukon Basin (principally near Fairbanks) yielded 3,850,000 ounces more than in 1905, and those of the Seward Peninsula increased 2,700,000 ounces. The quartz mines of southeastern Alaska produced about the same amount of gold as usual, namely, $3,500,000. The copper mines of Ketchikan added a relatively small amount. An increase corresponding to that of 1906 is not to be looked for during 1907, but rather a decrease, owing to labor troubles at Fairbanks, Nome, and Juneau.
The silver output is nominal and remains about constant, most of it being derived from the small percentage of this metal which is contained in placer gold.
Arizona.—The gold production of Arizona amounted to $2,964,683, an increase of $165,469. Somewhat less than one-half of this came from Yavapai County, which includes the Prescott mining region. Mohave, Cochise, and Yuma counties come next, none of the remain­ing counties reaching the $100,000 mark. In Mohave and Yuma counties the larger part of the gold was derived from siliceous ores, while in Cochise five-sixths of the gold was derived from copper and also lead ores. In Yavapai County somewhat more than one-fourth was derived from siliceous ores, the remainder from copper ore. For the State as a whole approximately the same amounts of gold are derived from siliceous ores and from copper ores. The placer production approximates $40,000, partly from dry washings. On the whole the mining industry experienced a successful year. The mining of siliceous ores yielded less than in 1905, but there was an increase from copper ores and also from lead ores. Unless siliceous ores greatly increase there is reason to anticipate a small decline of the gold production in 1907.
Silver was produced in Arizona to the amount of 3,026,438 fine ounces, an increase of 420,726 ounces. Cochise County leads, closely followed by Yavapai, both with approximately 700,000 ounces. Next follows Gila with 110,098 ounces, and Graham with 107,045 ounces. The great copper mines at Clifton and Globe are, chiefly responsible for the large silver production in Graham and Gila coun­ties. The Cochise County silver product is about evenly distributed between the copper ores of Bisbee and the lead ores of Tombstone and other camps. Siliceous ores contribute also a large amount to the silver recovered in Yavapai County. As the silver of Arizona is predominantly derived from copper ores, it is likely that a reduction of the copper output for 1907 wall adversely affect the output of silver.
California.—There is little change in the gold output of California. The production in 1906 was $18,732,452, a decrease of $166,093 from 1905. For the first time in many 3rears a placer mining county leads, Butte having produced over $3,000,000; Nevada County comes next with about $2,600,000, closely followed by Amador: Calaveras, Tuolumne, and Yuba also exceed the $1,000,000 mark. The rearrangement is due to a decrease in the production of siliceous ores and to a great increase in placer gold from dredging opera­tions. Increases are shown only by Butte, Sacramento, Shasta, and Yuba. California produced $7,375,925 of placer gold, of which $5,098,359 is due to dredging. Yuba for the first time appears as a
Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906 Page of 77 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
US Geol. Surv. 1906. Gemstones, Metals.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page