Quantcast

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906 Page of 77 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906 Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
GOLD AND SILVER.
127
additions to the tonnage of 1905 were Bisbee and Globe in Arizona, Butte in Montana, Bingham in Utah, and Ducktown in Tennessee. Idaho recorded an increase of Coeur d'Alene lead ores, while Colo-rado added to its tonnage from the siliceous ores of the Telluride dis­tricts and from the mixed smelting ores of Leadville and Creede. Ores of lower grade than in 1905 were mined in Butte and Leadville, so that in spite of heavily increased tonnage the total quantities extracted fell off. The slump in the price of copper in 1907 will result in a much lower tonnage for that year in Butte and probably also in Arizona, while the Bingham and Tintic districts, as well as the Colorado camps, will be affected to a less extent.
The average extracted value of the ores in gold and silver is lower in 1906 than in 1905 by 17 cents per ton, and now stands at $4.65. The average value is higher in Arizona by 37 cents, in Idaho by 24 cents, and in Utah by 10 cents. The unusually rich gold ores of Goldfield increased the average value of Nevada ores by $9. On the other hand, Colorado ores decreased 92 cents, Oregon ores 40 cents, California ores 31 cents, and Montana ores 39 cents in average value per ton. In spite of the notable rise in values the ore produc­tion of Nevada for 1906 is only greater by about 64,000 tons than it was in 1905. In tonnage the important States, including Alaska, now rank as follows: Montana, Arizona, Colorado, California, Utah, Idaho, South Dakota, Alaska. In 1905 California occupied the sec­ond place.
The division of the tonnage shows that the copper ores and the siliceous ores are most important with, respectively, about 10,500,000 and 9,200,000 tons. Gold and silver bearing lead ores amounted to only about 2,300,000 tons, while the remaining divisions, zinc ores, lead-zinc ores, and lead-copper ores, aggregated only about 1,250,000 tons. The greatest average extracted values in gold and silver are shown by the siliceous ores, $7.87 per ton, and they vary from S31.64 per ton in Nevada to $15.43 per ton in Colorado, $12.29 per ton in Idaho, $6.33 per ton in Arizona, $5.05 per ton in California, $2.40 per ton in Alaska, and to the minimum $1.60 per ton in South Carolina.
The copper ores are much poorer in gold and silver, the average extraction value being only $1.55 per ton. They range from $12.82 in Colorado to $3.38 in Utah, $1.58 in Montana, $0.79 in Arizona, and to only a fraction of a cent in Tennessee and in the Lake Superior copper mines.
The lead ores average $5.08 per ton, much of the value being in silver. Utah lead ores and copper-lead ores, chiefly from Park City, Bingham, and Tintic districts, contain from $10 to $15.20 in gold and silver. Those from Colorado contain $8.75, while the Idaho lead ores, largely from the Coeur d'Alene district, average only $3.34, of which all but a small fraction is in silver.
The zinc ores of Colorado average only $1.60 per ton, but it is to be noted that in some of the ores included the silver is not extracted. The same applies to New Mexico. The lead-zinc ores average higher—$3.07 per ton. In many cases they are concentrates, and the richer lead ores are separated from the poorer zinc blendes.
Tables showing the extent of concentration will be found in many of the State reports, but it is not yet possible to compute a general table illustrating this for all of the Western States. 21650—m k 1906------9
Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906 Page of 77 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1906
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
US Geol. Surv. 1906. Gemstones, Metals.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
Other Books on this topic
bullet Tag
This Page