now
only about 15,000,000 ounces. Idaho is far in the lead, with over
7,500,000 ounces, chiefly from the low-grade lead ores of the Coeur
d'Alene district, which only average about half a cent in gold and 5
ounces in silver per ton. These figures are of course materially
raised by concentration of the ore. Colorado follows Idaho with a
production of about 3,500,000 ounces, a notable loss compared with
1905 and with 1904. Aspen, Leadville, and Clear Creek continue to be
the most productive districts. Utah ranks third, with about 2,700,000
ounces, which is notably less than the output of 1905. Park City
district still further reduced its output of silver from lead ores.
Arizona ranks fourth, with 700,000 ounces, to which Tombstone ores
contribute largely. Montana, formerly an important producer of lead
ores, now ranks fifth, with an output of onlv 500,000 ounces.
Oxidized
lead ores now yield very little silver. Ores of this character are
about exhausted. Small quantities are still furnished by Leadville,
Aspen, and other placers in Colorado, and by Arizona, New Mexico, and
Nevada.
Copper-lead ores.—Ores
of this character, more or less mixed with sphalerite, are marketed
almost exclusively from Utah, with a smaller quantity from Montana. The
Tintic and Park City districts j'ielded nearly the whole of the Utah
production, most of it coming from the former district. These ores are
rich in silver, and 6,500,000 ounces represented their yield, an
increase of about 1,000,000 ounces compared with 1905.
Zinc ores and zinc-lead ores.—The
zinc ores proper contribute a very small amount of silver. Zinc-lead
ores are produced chiefly in Colorado, and in 1906 yielded about
2,300,000 ounces. They are usualty concentrated with zinc and lead
products. The division between the two classes is more or less
arbitrary, but the greater activity in zinc mining is clearly reflected
in the total silver yield from these ores, which was about 2,370,000
ounces, against 1,720,000 ounces in 1905.