Quantcast

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1913

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1913 Page of 115 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1913 Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
GOLD AND SILVER.
871
put of argentiferous zinc ores decreased from 177,946 to 141,295 tons in Colorado. The yield of gold and silver bearing lead-zinc ores decreased from 229,107 to 203,367 tons in Colorado and from 216,764 to 211,609 tons in Utah, but increased from 480,126 to 646,080 tons in Idaho. The production of these ores in Montana for the two years is not comparable, owing to changes in the Survey classification of Montana ores for 1913; but the output for that State made a large increase for the year to 307,615 short tons.
The average extraction value of precious metals per ton of dry or siliceous ores increased in Alaska from $2.85 in 1912 to $2.99 in 1913, and in California from $4.95 to $5.61, but decreased in Colorado from $10.53 to $9.57, in Nevada from $14.74 to $12.23, in South Dakota from $4.21 to $3.91, and in Utah from $9.78 to $7.97.
The average extraction value of gold and silver per ton in copper ores increased from $0.18 to $0.26 in Nevada, and from $0,105 to $0.11 in Tennessee, remained at $0.41 in Arizona, and decreased from $1.91 to $1.84-in California, from $0,211 to $0.10 in Michigan (silver only), from $1.42 to $1.29 in Montana, from $0,275 to $0.11 in New Mexico, and from $0.56 to $0.38 in Utah. The value in lead ores increased from $2.78 to $2.99 in Idaho, but decreased from $8.67 to $7.94 in Utah, a continuation of like changes for 1912. In lead-zinc ores the average extraction value of gold and silver per ton increased from $2.17 to $2.47 in Colorado, and from $0.68 to $1.55 in Idaho, but decreased from $4.48 to $3.60 in Utah. The average value for Montana ores of this class was $3.44 in 1913.
AVERAGE TENOR OF SILVER IN ORES, BY MINING DISTRICTS.
In the general Survey report on gold and silver by the writer for 1911 the results were given of a brief study of the tenor of silver in ores by mining districts. A few copies of that report are still avail­able for distribution.
The bulk of the silver production, as shown, is from more widely distributed sources than that of gold, the placers and mixed ores playing little part, but the dry or siliceous silver, silver-gold, and gold-silver ores, the copper ores, and the lead ores contributing more equally in the product. The high tenor of many dry or siliceous and lead ores (with the notable exception of the lead ores of the Coeur d'Alene) are shown, as well as the high tenor of silver in the copper ores in the Chitina region, Alaska, and the Leadville, Tintic, and Chewelah districts in the United States. The low silver content of the Clifton, Ray, and Ely copper ores, and especially of the Santa Rita (Chino) copper ores, is also notable.
DISTRIBUTION OF GOLD PRODUCTION OF 1913, BY SOURCES.
As shown by the following table the great bulk of the domestic gold output is from dry or siliceous ores—normally gold-quartz and gold-silver quartzose ores—and from placers, over 91 per cent of the total gold production coming from these sources alone. The total contribution of gold derived from the great copper, lead, and zinc mines of the country is therefore relatively small, notwithstanding their recent enormous development and tonnage. The changes in relative output from the various sources given in the table have been unimportant in the last four years. It is interesting to note, however,
Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1913 Page of 115 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1913
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
US Geol. Surv. 1913. Gemstones, Metals.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
bullet Tag
This Page