Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1916

Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1916 Page of 78 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1916 Text size:minus plus Restore normal size   Mail page  Print this page
706                           MINERAL RESOURCES, 1916----PART I.
The total quantity of ore sold or treated and from which gold or silver was produced increased from 50,513,452 short tons in 1915 to 66,388,402 short tons in 1916, the largest quantity of such ores ever recorded. The total of such ores has increased more than 23,000,000 tons in two years. In 1916 the quantity of copper ores sold or treated increased more than 14,500,000 tons; dry or siliceous ores, more than 230,000 tons; zinc ores, 320,000 tons; copper-lead ores, 69,000 tons; and lead-zinc ores, 800,000 tons. Arizona, Utah, and Mon tana continued to lead in quantity of ore, owing to the largely increased output from copper mines, the ore from Arizona and I tali being mainly from low-grade disseminated ores and that from Montana mainly from the Butte vein deposits. Nevada ranked next in output of ore, mainly from Ely copper ores, but also from siliceous ores from Goldfield, Tonopah, and other districts. Alaska, New Mexico, California, Idaho, and Colorado come next, with an output mainly of dry or siliceous ores from many districts in Alaska, Cali­fornia, and Colorado, and of copper ores from the low-grade ore bodies in New Mexico.
The large production of lead and lead-zinc ores in Idaho ranked that State before South Dakota and California, which yielded ores that were mainly all dry or siliceous in character.
The average gold and silver extraction values were high for the siliceous ores of Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Idaho, and Washington, and low for the larger ore bodies of California, South Dakota, and Alaska. Some of the States produced comparatively small quantities of copper ore carrying high extraction values in gold and silver, but the copper ores of the important copper-producing States showed low extraction values. The average recovery in gold and silver from the copper ores of Arizona was $0.35 a ton, that of Tennessee $0.14 a ton, that of Montana $1.32 a ton, that of Nevada $0.34, that of New Mexico $0.11, that of Utah $0.32, and that of Michigan $0.22. The lead ores of Utah showed an average recovery in gold and silver of $9.07 a ton, and the lead ores of Idaho only $3.98 a ton. Idaho produced the largest quantity of gold and silver bearing lead ores, and also lead-zinc ores. Utah yielded the next largest quantity of these classes of ore, but the gold, and sdver content of such ore was less than that of Montana ores of similar character. About 19.5 per cent of the output of ore considered as producing gold and silver was dry or siliceous ore, against 25 per cent in 1915; 71.5 per cent was copper ore, against 65 per cent in 1915; 3.58 per cent was lead ore; 4.07 per cent was lead-zinc ore; 1.25 per cent was zinc ore, and 0.12 per cent was copper-lead ore. The average precious-metal extraction value per ton of siliceous ores of the United States decreased from $6.26 to $5.73, that of zinc ores from $1.32 to $1.21, and that of copper-lead ores from $15.55 to $5.54. The average gold and silver value of copper ores per ton was 51 cents in each year, and that of lead-zinc ores increased from $2.06 to $2.31.
DISTRIBUTION OF MINE PRODUCTION OF GOLD IN 1916, BY
SOURCES.
As shown by the following table, the great bulk of the domestic output of gold is obtained from dry or siliceous ore—normally gold quartz ana gold-silver quartzose ores—and from placers, more than
Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1916 Page of 78 Ch. 1: Gold and Silver in 1916
Table Of Contents bullet Annotate/ Highlight
US Geol. Surv. 1916. Gemstones, Metals.
Suggested Illustrations
Other Chapters you may find useful
bullet Tag
This Page